Re: [one-users] Problems using OpenNebula EC2 interface

2011-05-06 Thread Daniel Molina
Hi Lars, I think the best solution would be to change the econe client implementation to use the sha1 password, therefore the EC2_SECRET_KEY can be used in the same way for the three clients. The priority is CLI ENV ONE_AUTH I have opened a ticket regarding this issue to include it in the next

Re: [one-users] Problems using OpenNebula EC2 interface

2011-05-06 Thread Lars Kellogg-Stedman
I think the best solution would be to change the econe client implementation to use the sha1 password, therefore the EC2_SECRET_KEY can be used in the same way for the three clients. The priority is CLI ENV ONE_AUTH Sounds good to me! -- Lars Kellogg-Stedman l...@seas.harvard.edu Senior

Re: [one-users] Problems using OpenNebula EC2 interface

2011-05-04 Thread Lars Kellogg-Stedman
The econe tools use the ruby URI gem that will take the host part of the string and will ignore the path. It is probably a misnomer to call this a URL, then. Perhaps the documentation should be clear that is really just a hostname. running the OCCI server and the EC2 server in different

Re: [one-users] Problems using OpenNebula EC2 interface

2011-05-04 Thread Lars Kellogg-Stedman
Maybe the problem is related to the previous point. The Signature that will authenticate the user is generated using the EC2_URL, maybe the server is ignoring the path section. Would you mind to try starting the server without path?. I've been able to get the EC2 service to work using

Re: [one-users] Problems using OpenNebula EC2 interface

2011-05-04 Thread Daniel Molina
Would you mind to try specifying: SSL_SERVER=arc-vm-opennebula.int.seas.harvard.edu:80 instead of SSL_SERVER=arc-vm-opennebula.int.seas.harvard.edu Kind regards. On 4 May 2011 19:14, Lars Kellogg-Stedman l...@seas.harvard.edu wrote: Maybe the problem is related to the previous point. The

Re: [one-users] Problems using OpenNebula EC2 interface

2011-05-04 Thread Lars Kellogg-Stedman
Would you mind to try specifying: SSL_SERVER=arc-vm-opennebula.int.seas.harvard.edu:80 instead of SSL_SERVER=arc-vm-opennebula.int.seas.harvard.edu Both euca-describe-images and econe-describe-images fail with this change. -- Lars Kellogg-Stedman l...@seas.harvard.edu Senior Technologist

Re: [one-users] Problems using OpenNebula EC2 interface

2011-05-04 Thread Daniel Molina
Ok, I think the problem was that the EC2_SECRET_KEY for euca tools is the sha1 password and in the econe client is the plain password. On 4 May 2011 19:41, Lars Kellogg-Stedman l...@seas.harvard.edu wrote: Would you mind to try specifying: SSL_SERVER=arc-vm-opennebula.int.seas.harvard.edu:80

Re: [one-users] Problems using OpenNebula EC2 interface

2011-05-04 Thread Lars Kellogg-Stedman
Ok, I think the problem was that the EC2_SECRET_KEY for euca tools is the sha1 password and in the econe client is the plain password. Ah, that did it. The fact the econe-* expects different values from both EcuaTools and Elastic Fox is somewhat confusing. Do you think it would make sense for

[one-users] Problems using OpenNebula EC2 interface

2011-05-03 Thread Lars Kellogg-Stedman
After successfully getting the OCCI clients working with OpenNebula, I've tried getting the EC2 interface to work and I've run into a variety of problems. (1) The OpenNebula tools don't respect the path in EC2_URL. If EC2_URL is set to something like http://myserver/ec2/;, the OpenNebula EC2