Re: [one-users] Shared File System HA

2012-03-16 Thread richard -rw- weinberger
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Hans-Joachim Ehlers wrote: >> ...GPFS ... >> apologies for hijacking the thread - is there a specific way to configure >> this filesystem to work with OpenNebula? >> how should we go about to enable this? > > To more precise: We will use GPFS as the clustered FS f

Re: [one-users] Shared File System HA

2012-03-16 Thread Nicolas Diogo
have you checked this thread? http://www.mail-archive.com/users@lists.opennebula.org/msg05560.html they discuss other option for distributed / shared storage subsystems On 16/03/12 08:41, Hans-Joachim Ehlers wrote: >> ...GPFS ... >> apologies for hijacking the thread - is there a specific way t

Re: [one-users] Shared File System HA

2012-03-16 Thread Hans-Joachim Ehlers
> ...GPFS ... > apologies for hijacking the thread - is there a specific way to configure > this filesystem to work with OpenNebula? > how should we go about to enable this? To more precise: We will use GPFS as the clustered FS for our KVM hosts. If OpenNebula works with it - fine. If not then O

Re: [one-users] Shared File System HA

2012-03-15 Thread Nicolas Diogo
Original Message Subject:Re: [one-users] Shared File System HA Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:00:27 + From: Nicolas Diogo To: Hans-Joachim Ehlers Hi, apologies for hijacking the thread - is there a specific way to configure this filesystem to work with

Re: [one-users] Shared File System HA

2012-03-14 Thread Ranga Chakravarthula
** ** > > Thanks, > > Marshall > > ** ** > > *From:* Ranga Chakravarthula [mailto:rb...@hexagrid.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 14, 2012 4:08 PM > > *To:* Marshall Grillos > *Cc:* users@lists.opennebula.org > *Subject:* Re: [one-users] Shared File System HA

Re: [one-users] Shared File System HA

2012-03-14 Thread Marshall Grillos
arshall Grillos Cc: users@lists.opennebula.org<mailto:users@lists.opennebula.org> Subject: Re: [one-users] Shared File System HA If you are looking at HA at storage level, it would be better you have Heartbeat/Failover on the NFS resource than failing over to secondary front-end server. Anyway

Re: [one-users] Shared File System HA

2012-03-14 Thread Ranga Chakravarthula
en my existing hardware configuration. > > ** ** > > Thanks, > > Marshall > > ** ** > > *From:* Ranga Chakravarthula [mailto:rb...@hexagrid.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 14, 2012 10:57 AM > *To:* Marshall Grillos > *Cc:* users@lists.opennebula.org >

Re: [one-users] Shared File System HA

2012-03-14 Thread Marshall Grillos
:57 AM To: Marshall Grillos Cc: users@lists.opennebula.org Subject: Re: [one-users] Shared File System HA If you are looking at HA at storage level, it would be better you have Heartbeat/Failover on the NFS resource than failing over to secondary front-end server. Anyway your NFS is mounted on the comput

Re: [one-users] Shared File System HA

2012-03-14 Thread Ranga Chakravarthula
If you are looking at HA at storage level, it would be better you have Heartbeat/Failover on the NFS resource than failing over to secondary front-end server. Anyway your NFS is mounted on the compute nodes and if one storage goes down, heartbeat will failover to another storage. Your frontend does

Re: [one-users] Shared File System HA

2012-03-14 Thread Hans-Joachim Ehlers
client must at least use the mount option “hard“ Hth Hajo From: users-boun...@lists.opennebula.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opennebula.org] On Behalf Of Marshall Grillos Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 4:27 PM To: users@lists.opennebula.org Subject: [one-users] Shared File System HA I am

[one-users] Shared File System HA

2012-03-14 Thread Marshall Grillos
I am debating the differences between Shared and Non-shared file systems for an OpenNebula deployment. One concern with the shared file system is High Availability. I am setting up the OpenNebula front-end with connectivity to a storage device. To avoid the event of a storage device failure (