On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Hans-Joachim Ehlers
wrote:
>> ...GPFS ...
>> apologies for hijacking the thread - is there a specific way to configure
>> this filesystem to work with OpenNebula?
>> how should we go about to enable this?
>
> To more precise: We will use GPFS as the clustered FS f
have you checked this thread?
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@lists.opennebula.org/msg05560.html
they discuss other option for distributed / shared storage subsystems
On 16/03/12 08:41, Hans-Joachim Ehlers wrote:
>> ...GPFS ...
>> apologies for hijacking the thread - is there a specific way t
> ...GPFS ...
> apologies for hijacking the thread - is there a specific way to configure
> this filesystem to work with OpenNebula?
> how should we go about to enable this?
To more precise: We will use GPFS as the clustered FS for our KVM hosts. If
OpenNebula works with it - fine. If not then O
Original Message
Subject:Re: [one-users] Shared File System HA
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:00:27 +
From: Nicolas Diogo
To: Hans-Joachim Ehlers
Hi,
apologies for hijacking the thread - is there a specific way to
configure this filesystem to work with
** **
>
> Thanks,
>
> Marshall
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Ranga Chakravarthula [mailto:rb...@hexagrid.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 14, 2012 4:08 PM
>
> *To:* Marshall Grillos
> *Cc:* users@lists.opennebula.org
> *Subject:* Re: [one-users] Shared File System HA
arshall Grillos
Cc: users@lists.opennebula.org<mailto:users@lists.opennebula.org>
Subject: Re: [one-users] Shared File System HA
If you are looking at HA at storage level, it would be better you have
Heartbeat/Failover on the NFS resource than failing over to secondary front-end
server. Anyway
en my existing hardware configuration.
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,
>
> Marshall
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Ranga Chakravarthula [mailto:rb...@hexagrid.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 14, 2012 10:57 AM
> *To:* Marshall Grillos
> *Cc:* users@lists.opennebula.org
>
:57 AM
To: Marshall Grillos
Cc: users@lists.opennebula.org
Subject: Re: [one-users] Shared File System HA
If you are looking at HA at storage level, it would be better you have
Heartbeat/Failover on the NFS resource than failing over to secondary front-end
server. Anyway your NFS is mounted on the comput
If you are looking at HA at storage level, it would be better you have
Heartbeat/Failover on the NFS resource than failing over to secondary
front-end server. Anyway your NFS is mounted on the compute nodes and if
one storage goes down, heartbeat will failover to another storage. Your
frontend does
client must at least use the mount option “hard“
Hth
Hajo
From: users-boun...@lists.opennebula.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opennebula.org] On Behalf Of Marshall Grillos
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 4:27 PM
To: users@lists.opennebula.org
Subject: [one-users] Shared File System HA
I am
I am debating the differences between Shared and Non-shared file systems for an
OpenNebula deployment.
One concern with the shared file system is High Availability. I am setting up
the OpenNebula front-end with connectivity to a storage device. To avoid the
event of a storage device failure (
11 matches
Mail list logo