Re: [one-users] Some questions about overcommitment in OpenNebula 4.2 using KVM

2013-11-06 Thread Ruben S. Montero
Did you copied or onehost sync the modified rb to the hosts?. If the output is ok running the probes directly then OpenNebula should update the value. Could you send the ouput of the probe?, just to doble check it is ok. VMEMORY is not ready for 4.4... Ruben On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Ge

Re: [one-users] Some questions about overcommitment in OpenNebula 4.2 using KVM

2013-10-21 Thread Gerry O'Brien
On 18/10/2013 20:10, Michał Madziar wrote: On 2013-10-18 17:36, Gerry O'Brien wrote: On 16/10/2013 20:40, Michał Madziar wrote: On 2013-10-16 21:00, Gerry O'Brien wrote: On 16/10/2013 17:19, Michał Madziar wrote: _requirements" lives? I didn't touch the scheduler, just patched the reporting s

Re: [one-users] Some questions about overcommitment in OpenNebula 4.2 using KVM

2013-10-18 Thread Michał Madziar
On 2013-10-18 17:36, Gerry O'Brien wrote: > On 16/10/2013 20:40, Michał Madziar wrote: >> On 2013-10-16 21:00, Gerry O'Brien wrote: >>> On 16/10/2013 17:19, Michał Madziar wrote: _requirements" lives? >> I didn't touch the scheduler, just patched the reporting script. >> On my system it exists in ~

Re: [one-users] Some questions about overcommitment in OpenNebula 4.2 using KVM

2013-10-18 Thread Gerry O'Brien
On 16/10/2013 20:40, Michał Madziar wrote: On 2013-10-16 21:00, Gerry O'Brien wrote: On 16/10/2013 17:19, Michał Madziar wrote: On 2013-10-16 14:42, Gerry O'Brien wrote: Hi, Do you know if the CPU parameter has any effect on the amount of real cpu used, e.g. if I set the CPU parameter t

Re: [one-users] Some questions about overcommitment in OpenNebula 4.2 using KVM

2013-10-17 Thread Gerry O'Brien
On 16/10/2013 22:32, Ruben S. Montero wrote: libvirt uses cgroups, so yes, it does. cgroups do not seem to be enabled with kvm. Am I correct in assuming this? Yes it is configured by default. You have to enable it in the hypervisors, though http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel4.2:kvmg#wo

Re: [one-users] Some questions about overcommitment in OpenNebula 4.2 using KVM

2013-10-16 Thread Ruben S. Montero
> libvirt uses cgroups, so yes, it does. >> > cgroups do not seem to be enabled with kvm. Am I correct in assuming this? Yes it is configured by default. You have to enable it in the hypervisors, though http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel4.2:kvmg#working_with_cgroups_optional > > >> >>>

Re: [one-users] Some questions about overcommitment in OpenNebula 4.2 using KVM

2013-10-16 Thread Michał Madziar
On 2013-10-16 21:00, Gerry O'Brien wrote: > On 16/10/2013 17:19, Michał Madziar wrote: >> On 2013-10-16 14:42, Gerry O'Brien wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Do you know if the CPU parameter has any effect on the amount of >>> real cpu used, e.g. if I set the CPU parameter to 0.1 will this limit >>> the

Re: [one-users] Some questions about overcommitment in OpenNebula 4.2 using KVM

2013-10-16 Thread Gerry O'Brien
On 16/10/2013 17:19, Michał Madziar wrote: On 2013-10-16 14:42, Gerry O'Brien wrote: Hi, Do you know if the CPU parameter has any effect on the amount of real cpu used, e.g. if I set the CPU parameter to 0.1 will this limit the actual cpu usage? libvirt uses cgroups, so yes, it does. cgr

Re: [one-users] Some questions about overcommitment in OpenNebula 4.2 using KVM

2013-10-16 Thread Michał Madziar
On 2013-10-16 14:42, Gerry O'Brien wrote: > Hi, > > Do you know if the CPU parameter has any effect on the amount of > real cpu used, e.g. if I set the CPU parameter to 0.1 will this limit > the actual cpu usage? libvirt uses cgroups, so yes, it does. > > Also, can the monitor driver be

Re: [one-users] Some questions about overcommitment in OpenNebula 4.2 using KVM

2013-10-16 Thread Gerry O'Brien
Hi, Do you know if the CPU parameter has any effect on the amount of real cpu used, e.g. if I set the CPU parameter to 0.1 will this limit the actual cpu usage? Also, can the monitor driver be configured to report multiples of memory and allow memory overcommitment in the same way?