Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] opensips + openims

2009-08-04 Thread Franz Edler
Hi Baye, the main issue is to carefully design your DNS environment. You already need a DNS domain for OpenIMS. So, if you have a DNS domain for OpenIMS in place and a different one for OpenSIPS, all should work automatically. If you send a request from an OpenSIPS user towards OpenIMS it shou

[OpenSIPS-Users] load balance module routing

2009-08-04 Thread Ben Dinnerville
Hi All, I am looking into using the load balance module to load balance inbound calls across a asterisk cluster (We currently use LCR for round robin distribution). We offer different services on inbound calls such as vxml, voice rec etc which when using the load balance module, it looks like

[OpenSIPS-Users] opensips + openims

2009-08-04 Thread bayeyuyu
Hi all I am just testing opensips and openims working together, like this sip phone <->opensips<->openims<-->ims client sip phone register at the opensips and ims client register at openims. opensips works as sip server and proxy server, when sip phone invite an ims client, open

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Contact header

2009-08-04 Thread Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 00:07:30 Dan Pascu wrote: > On Tuesday 04 August 2009, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote: > > I wonder how other could use dialog module and other modules that depends > > on it with such "limitations" ... > > That's because you lack imagination and because your purpose

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] mailing list reply-to : list or sender

2009-08-04 Thread Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 23:41:57 Dan Pascu wrote: > On Wednesday 05 August 2009, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > > "normal" is a fuzzy word. I can do the change, not a problem, but just > > to past what mailman says: > > > > "Where are replies to list messages directed? Poster is *strongly* > > reco

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Contact header

2009-08-04 Thread Dan Pascu
On Tuesday 04 August 2009, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote: > I wonder how other could use dialog module and other modules that depends on > it with such "limitations" ... That's because you lack imagination and because your purpose doesn't seem to be to have a problem solved or to help solv

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] mailing list reply-to : list or sender

2009-08-04 Thread Dan Pascu
On Wednesday 05 August 2009, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > "normal" is a fuzzy word. I can do the change, not a problem, but just > to past what mailman says: > > "Where are replies to list messages directed? Poster is *strongly* > recommended for most mailing lists. -> Poster This list

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] mailing list reply-to : list or sender

2009-08-04 Thread Saúl Ibarra
I would also favour "This list". I'm subscribed to a bunch of mailing lists, and in those where the 'Poster' is configured I sometimes get emails only sent to me, which may hide some interesting information for the mailing list archive. Just my 2 cents, -- Saúl -- "Nunca subestimes el ancho d

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Contact header

2009-08-04 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote: > On Tuesday 04 August 2009 21:15:54 you wrote: > >> saying that the dialog module is broken is an over-statement - I admit >> there are some issues that still need to be worked out in the module >> (forking and early dialogs) - see the thread on the devel ma

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] mailing list reply-to : list or sender

2009-08-04 Thread Alex Balashov
I would favour "This List." This is the way that most mailing lists seem to work in my experience, and it does the maximum to encourage discussion to stay on the list -- which is good, and serves the aim of keeping the discussion public, on record, archivable and searchable. I get a lot of pri

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] mailing list reply-to : list or sender

2009-08-04 Thread brett
I like the way it is. I can easily manage who my messages goto with reply or reply to all. Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:59:57 To: Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana Cc: Subject: [OpenSIPS-Users] mailing

[OpenSIPS-Users] mailing list reply-to : list or sender

2009-08-04 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
"normal" is a fuzzy word. I can do the change, not a problem, but just to past what mailman says: "Where are replies to list messages directed? Poster is *strongly* recommended for most mailing lists. -> Poster This list Explicit address " Currently is "Poster"(which is recommended)

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Contact header

2009-08-04 Thread Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 21:15:54 you wrote: > saying that the dialog module is broken is an over-statement - I admit > there are some issues that still need to be worked out in the module > (forking and early dialogs) - see the thread on the devel mailing list, > but otherwise the module is prett

[OpenSIPS-Users] Fwd: Re: Contact header

2009-08-04 Thread Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
Please ... could be possible to setup the mailling list as "normal" mailling lists that with "Reply" just send the reply to the list and not to personal inbox .. ? -- Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana Dimensión Virtual --- Begin Message --- On Tuesday 04 August 2009 21:08:03 you wrote: > > Maybe it

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTP timeout and opensip b2bua

2009-08-04 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi Laurent, For hanging up a call from the middle (trigger by whatever event), you do not need something so complex as the b2bua. You can simply use the dialog support and configure in rtpproxy (on the media timeout event) to trigger the "dlg_end_dlg" MI command to BYE the call from the middle

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Contact header

2009-08-04 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi Raúl, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote: > On Tuesday 04 August 2009 13:03:02 Jeff Pyle wrote: > >> Raul, perhaps I can explain from the perspective of someone who may benefit >> from such misplaced features. >> > > >> "Better" is in the eye of the beholder. Or, perhaps in these ca

[OpenSIPS-Users] RTP timeout and opensip b2bua

2009-08-04 Thread Laurent Schweizer
Hello, I see that rtpproxy has a new option to detect that no RTP packet is send in a call (RTP timeout) and that now opensips implement a B2Bua. I need to know if we can link the RTPproxy with this new B2Bua so if no RTP packet is send during a call, the B2Bua will stop the call by sendi

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] SIP/2.0 400 Content Length is Incorrect

2009-08-04 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi Julien, To be honest, in 90% of the case, a "smart" ALG is guilty for messing around with the SIP messages. Try ngrepping the request when going out from OpenSIPS and when being received by "PArtner" and see if "pix" screwed it up . Regards, Bogdan Julien Chavanton wrote: > Yes, signaling

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] SIP/2.0 400 Content Length is Incorrect

2009-08-04 Thread Julien Chavanton
Yes, signaling path is : [Eyebeam] > [Opensips] ---pix with(fixup protocol sip)--> [Partner] Right now, I beleive this is only taking place when the call come in from a certain subnet inside a the PIX firewall, so it may be a miss config on the firewall. I need to investigate further.

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Contact header

2009-08-04 Thread Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 13:03:02 Jeff Pyle wrote: > Raul, perhaps I can explain from the perspective of someone who may benefit > from such misplaced features. > "Better" is in the eye of the beholder. Or, perhaps in these cases, in the > eye of the implementer. If topology hiding is the only

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] New OpenXCAP release 1.1.1 (and collateral software )

2009-08-04 Thread Dan Pascu
On Tuesday 04 August 2009, Thiago Rondon wrote: > > When I update the software (and config.ini too) : > > Starting OpenXCAP server: > openxcap/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.5/application/configuration/__init__.py:52: > DeprecationWarning: read_settings is deprecated in favor of using > ConfigSect

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Queue management system and load balancer.

2009-08-04 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi Grygoriy, just my (other) 2 cents on this. the calls in the queue (as time as the fr_inv_timer is the same) will jump out from queue in the same order as entered (more or less). the biggest problem is (as you said) to avoid new calls to be delivered before the queued one. So, what you can

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] SIP/2.0 400 Content Length is Incorrect

2009-08-04 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2009/7/30 Julien Chavanton : > > This one return "SIP/2.0 400 Content Length is Incorrect (359 vs 356)." > > Content-Length: 360. > P-hint: Route[6]: med

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] SIP/2.0 400 Content Length is Incorrect

2009-08-04 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi Julien, yes, the Content len hdt contains the len of the body in chars (what the body is, including all the chars in there). In your case, you send a call from Eyebeam to OpenSIPS and you relay it further to another client which replies with the error? Regards, Bogdan Julien Chavanton wr

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] [OpenSIPS-Devel] [Webinar] Next webinar is "Types of Routes in OpenSIPS"

2009-08-04 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
I apology - the correct registration link is https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/403938514 Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > Hi, > > The next free webinar is scheduled for Wednesday, August 12, 2009. The topic > is "Types of Routes in OpenSIPS" > > This webinar will help you to understand how routi

[OpenSIPS-Users] [Webinar] Next webinar is "Types of Routes in OpenSIPS"

2009-08-04 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi, The next free webinar is scheduled for Wednesday, August 12, 2009. The topic is "Types of Routes in OpenSIPS" This webinar will help you to understand how routing is done by OpenSIPS. How the SIP messages (requests/replies) are processed inside OpenSIPS and what types of scripting routes a

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Scan all Contact adresses

2009-08-04 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi Yannick, Be aware that this new pseudo-variable is available only in opensips 1.6 (trunk / devel version). Regards, Bogdan Yannick LE COENT wrote: > I've tried to use $ct.fields(uri) in order to store the URI in the variable. > For instance: > $var(contacturi) = $(ct.fields(uri)); >

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Contact header

2009-08-04 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi Alex, There was a similar discussion couple of days ago ...about proxies :)And the final statement was that opensips is not only a proxy, but a SIP server : it include a multitude of functionalities - proxy, application agent, b2bua, presence server, etc... and you can use it It is up t

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] xcap_client module doesn't implement pidf-manipulation, right?

2009-08-04 Thread Anca Vamanu
Hi Inaki, Thanks for this report. I have fixed it to include pidf-manipulation also. It was not that pidf-manipulation was not supported, because this function was in fact used when the XCAP server signaled document updates through an MI command - refreshDocument (I doubt though that there is

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] New OpenXCAP release 1.1.1 (and collateral software)

2009-08-04 Thread Thiago Rondon
When I update the software (and config.ini too) : Starting OpenXCAP server: openxcap/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.5/application/configuration/__init__.py:52: DeprecationWarning: read_settings is deprecated in favor of using ConfigSection.read and will be removed in 1.2.0. warn("read_settings is

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Contact header

2009-08-04 Thread Alex Balashov
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > for hiding the topology, you do not really need to create a new call, but > simple to hide some information from the messagessomething that a > proxy can do in a more efficient way. Albeit, in a way that entirely breaks proxy spec, since the proxy isn't suppose

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Memory Issue

2009-08-04 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Dovid Bender wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Iñaki Baz Castillo" > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 13:02 > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Memory Issue > > > >> 2009/8/4 Dovid Bender : >> >>> Bogdan, >>> I am a bit of a n00b and I am taking over a production server. Can

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Memory Issue

2009-08-04 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi Dovid, OpenSIPS allocates the mem pool (the 268 M) at startup and after that it will not request more mem from OS - this is way the traditional ways to inspect mem usages (like "top") does not work. To inspect the memory usage (inside the pool), use statistics support: opensipsctl get_st

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Contact header

2009-08-04 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi Raúl, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote: > On Tuesday 04 August 2009 03:44:33 Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > >> Hi Michel, >> >> You can not change the IP in the contact without breaking the routing of >> the sequential requests. It might be possible by using dialog support >> for these calls

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Contact header

2009-08-04 Thread Jeff Pyle
Raul, perhaps I can explain from the perspective of someone who may benefit from such misplaced features. "Better" is in the eye of the beholder. Or, perhaps in these cases, in the eye of the implementer. If topology hiding is the only B2BUA-style feature I need and all my other requirements are

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] db_oracle module can not work

2009-08-04 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi, what version of opensips are you using ? Regards, Bogdan happybirdgo wrote: > Hello bogdan and noelrocha, > Have you solved the problem about db_oracle? > > Now I have the same problem when using db_oracle. > > In opensips.cfg: > loadmodule "db_oracle.so" # this works OK > > But after using

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips + Dispatcher + asterisk + fail over problem

2009-08-04 Thread Saúl Ibarra
It's OPTIONS, not OPTION :) -- Saúl -- "Nunca subestimes el ancho de banda de un camión lleno de disketes." http://www.saghul.net/ ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips + Dispatcher + asterisk + fail over problem

2009-08-04 Thread urmi lakkad
Hello Alex, First of all Thanks for ur Attention and quick response. If I use the OPTION then on Asterisk I m getting following: [Aug 4 17:15:32] NOTICE[7765]: chan_sip.c:14958 handle_request: Unknown SIP command 'OPTION' from '192.168.1.30' Even when that Asterisk Comes up, opensips is not s

[OpenSIPS-Users] New OpenXCAP release 1.1.1 (and collateral software)

2009-08-04 Thread Adrian Georgescu
Hello, There is a new release of OpenXCAP (1.1.1) and collateral software soap-simple-proxy (1.0.7), python-xcaplib (1.0.10) available. These releases contain bug fixes discovered at the last SIPIT in Tokio and better compatibility with and checks for the software they depends upon. To upg

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Memory Issue

2009-08-04 Thread Dovid Bender
- Original Message - From: "Iñaki Baz Castillo" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 13:02 Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Memory Issue > 2009/8/4 Dovid Bender : >> Bogdan, >> I am a bit of a n00b and I am taking over a production server. Can you >> explain a bit more ? > > Use: > > open

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips + Dispatcher + asterisk + fail over problem

2009-08-04 Thread Alex Balashov
urmi lakkad wrote: > modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_method", "INFO") Asterisk does not respond to these. Try using the OPTIONS method instead. -- Alex Balashov Evariste Systems Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel: (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 Mobile : (+1) (678)

[OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips + Dispatcher + asterisk + fail over problem

2009-08-04 Thread urmi lakkad
Hello, I am using Opensips and Asterisk for my call flow. I am using 3 Asterisks for call forwarding. Opensips's dispatcher module is doing the task of load balancing among all 3 Asterisk servers in a round robin fashion. i. e. 1st call to 1st Asterisk 2nd call to 2nd Asterisk 3rd call to 3rd As

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Memory Issue

2009-08-04 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2009/8/4 Dovid Bender : > Bogdan, > I am a bit of a n00b and I am taking over a production server. Can you > explain a bit more ? Use: opensipsctl fifo get_statistics -- Iñaki Baz Castillo ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://li

[OpenSIPS-Users] New MSRPRelay release 1.0.3

2009-08-04 Thread Adrian Georgescu
Hello, There is a new release of MSRPRelay available, This software implements an MSRP relay (RFC 4976), which is an extension to the MSRP protocol (RFC 4975). Its main role is to help NAT traversal of Interactive Messaging and file transfer sessions for SIP/MSRP endpoints located behind NAT.

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Memory Issue

2009-08-04 Thread Dovid Bender
I did a bit more digging. If I am reading things right shm total size is set to 268 megs. OpenSipS is not showing the memory consumption as what it is using (meaning that it shows < 268 megs yet if I restart OpenSipS it free's up 2-3 gigs of memory). - Original Message - From: "Dovid

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Contact header

2009-08-04 Thread Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 03:44:33 Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > Hi Michel, > > You can not change the IP in the contact without breaking the routing of > the sequential requests. It might be possible by using dialog support > for these calls and to store the contact into the dialog and to restore >