There is no formatting added, maybe the diff comes for the actual
logging. What are the 2 versions you tested ?
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
https://www.opensips-solutions.com
https://www.siphub.com
On 10.04.2024 00:21, Robert Dyck wrote:
In the past I would insert
Sorry my bad!
Actually I need to Wait for a specific time after 200 OK received from Bleg.
So in that specific time If I received Re-invite from Aleg then I need to
simply realy or if not received then need to do some other operation.
Regards,
*Parthesh Bhavsar | Software Engineer | VOIP*
On Tu
In the past I would insert xlog with $mb into my script for debugging purposes.
Now I find
that the message buffer output is not being formatted.
Instead of
Message Buffer
REGISTER sip:192.168.1.2 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.1.4:5070;branch=z9hG4bKce021e1d6a292d1504d0ff89e60c9ba;rport
I
Using the lb_status command with two params, the ID of the destination and
desired status (0 if you want to disable), this does seem to disable probing
though so the destination will stay disabled until you manually set status back
to 1
https://opensips.org/docs/modules/3.2.x/load_balancer.html#
Can you tell me how to disable a load balancer destination via mi ?
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024, 20:02 John Sliney, wrote:
> Is there currently a way to add a destination to the load_balancer set
> with a status of disabled but with probing enabled, like the dispatcher
> table 'state' column allows?
>
>
Is there currently a way to add a destination to the load_balancer set with a
status of disabled but with probing enabled, like the dispatcher table 'state'
column allows?
I have an osips working as a SIP ingress/egress for Kubernetes traffic and as
Asterisk Pods are created they are added to
This is a valid point that I missed. You can’t send an INVITE back to the UAC
while the original INVITE remains unanswered. The UAC should/must respond with
a 491 Request Pending.
This is the use case that UPDATE was created for, and that would work if the
UAC supports it. If it must be INVITE
Hi,
my 2 cents here - how comes you want to send a RE-INVITE _BEFORE_ having
the dialog established???
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
https://www.opensips-solutions.com
https://www.siphub.com
On 09.04.2024 17:35, Parthesh Bhavsar via Users wrote:
It seems af
Maybe using a timer route is the solution? Save 183 time in cache and check
if 200 ok is received within desired period, otherwise send reinvite...
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024, 4:48 PM Ben Newlin wrote:
> You’re right, that timer would drop the call. Not sure why I was thinking
> that would work. Sorry!
You’re right, that timer would drop the call. Not sure why I was thinking that
would work. Sorry!
Ben Newlin
From: Parthesh Bhavsar
Date: Tuesday, April 9, 2024 at 10:35 AM
To: Ben Newlin
Cc: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Waiting for 200 OK
EXTERNAL EMAIL - Pleas
It seems after setting T_fr_timeout parameter it was sending a CANCEL
request to another leg but for my requirement I need to send Reinvite. Also
for generating Reinvite I have used dlg_send_sequential() as I use
opensips as a proxy server. Any other modules on which I look for?
Regards,
*Parthes
The timing requirement can be solved using the $T_fr_timeout parameter [1].
For sending a re-Invite back to the UAC I believe you’d have to be a B2BUA.
[1] - https://opensips.org/docs/modules/3.4.x/tm.html#pv_T_fr_timeout
Ben Newlin
From: Users on behalf of Parthesh Bhavsar
via Users
Date: T
Hello,
I have a requirement where If I get 183 responses then I need to wait for a
specific period of time for 200 OK and if 200 OK is not received in that
time then I need to send Reinvte back to UA with some modifications. I have
gone through the SST module but have not found anything relevant t
13 matches
Mail list logo
