Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] B2BUA, authenticated INVITEs with "ACK for a negative reply"

2016-11-29 Thread Răzvan Crainea
On 11/29/2016 10:36 AM, Nathan Ward wrote: On 29/11/2016, at 9:26 PM, Răzvan Crainea wrote: On 11/29/2016 04:09 AM, Nathan Ward wrote: On 29/11/2016, at 5:25 AM, Răzvan Crainea wrote: Hi, Nathan! Have you tried calling b2b_init_request() with the

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] B2BUA, authenticated INVITEs with "ACK for a negative reply"

2016-11-29 Thread Nathan Ward
> On 29/11/2016, at 9:26 PM, Răzvan Crainea wrote: > > On 11/29/2016 04:09 AM, Nathan Ward wrote: >>> On 29/11/2016, at 5:25 AM, Răzvan Crainea wrote: >>> >>> Hi, Nathan! >>> >>> Have you tried calling b2b_init_request() with the "a" flag [1]? >>>

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] B2BUA, authenticated INVITEs with "ACK for a negative reply"

2016-11-29 Thread Răzvan Crainea
On 11/29/2016 04:09 AM, Nathan Ward wrote: On 29/11/2016, at 5:25 AM, Răzvan Crainea wrote: Hi, Nathan! Have you tried calling b2b_init_request() with the "a" flag [1]? [1] http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.2.x/b2b_logic.html#id294010 Hi, Yes I have. This

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] B2BUA, authenticated INVITEs with "ACK for a negative reply"

2016-11-28 Thread Nathan Ward
> On 29/11/2016, at 5:25 AM, Răzvan Crainea wrote: > > Hi, Nathan! > > Have you tried calling b2b_init_request() with the "a" flag [1]? > > [1] http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.2.x/b2b_logic.html#id294010 Hi, Yes I have. This passes through the authentication

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] B2BUA, authenticated INVITEs with "ACK for a negative reply"

2016-11-28 Thread Răzvan Crainea
Hi, Nathan! Have you tried calling b2b_init_request() with the "a" flag [1]? [1] http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.2.x/b2b_logic.html#id294010 Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com On 11/26/2016 06:04 AM, Nathan Ward wrote: Hi all, I am

[OpenSIPS-Users] B2BUA, authenticated INVITEs with "ACK for a negative reply"

2016-11-25 Thread Nathan Ward
Hi all, I am configuring an SBC with 3 legs - one to the core (i.e. to a registrar and routing server), one towards end users, and one towards a provider. My intent is to make he SBC fairly “dumb”, and not keep state of registrations etc. The provider requires registration and authentication