[OpenSIPS-Users] Invoking 'failure_route[X]' when OpenSIPS replies [3456]XX by itself

2008-11-26 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
Hi, is possible to invoke 'failure_route[X]' after OpenSIPS has sent a negative reply by itself to the caller? In this case the reply would be sent to the caller but it would selected as final reply. Well, I expect this is not possible since 'failure_route' is just invoked when the final respon

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Invoking 'failure_route[X]' when OpenSIPS replies [3456]XX by itself

2008-11-26 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
El Miércoles, 26 de Noviembre de 2008, Iñaki Baz Castillo escribió: > Hi, is possible to invoke 'failure_route[X]' after OpenSIPS has sent a > negative reply by itself to the caller? In this case the reply would be > sent to the caller but it would selected as final reply. > > Well, I expect this i

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Invoking 'failure_route[X]' when OpenSIPS replies [3456]XX by itself

2008-11-26 Thread Brett Nemeroff
Why not just call a normal route after you send your negative reply?-Brett On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El Miércoles, 26 de Noviembre de 2008, Iñaki Baz Castillo escribió: > > Hi, is possible to invoke 'failure_route[X]' after OpenSIPS has sent

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Invoking 'failure_route[X]' when OpenSIPS replies [3456]XX by itself

2008-11-26 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
El Miércoles, 26 de Noviembre de 2008, Brett Nemeroff escribió: > Why not just call a normal route after you send your negative reply? Because I've already coded the needed logic in a failure_route that would be runned when a negative reply comes from the callee. But I want the same behaviour wh

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Invoking 'failure_route[X]' when OpenSIPS replies [3456]XX by itself

2008-11-26 Thread Brett Nemeroff
That's better than what I had in mind. :) I don't think that's too bad really.. Conforms with all the rules of what a failure route is for.. so I think that's a good way to do it. Just my $0.02 -Brett On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El Miércole