Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RURI domain on NAT'd endpoints

2009-09-08 Thread Jeff Pyle
All very good points. I've largely been able to avoid NAT up until now, so I'm afraid I'm a bit too green to offer any clarification. - Jeff On 9/8/09 1:08 AM, Thomas Gelf tho...@gelf.net wrote: Thomas Gelf wrote: Jeff Pyle wrote: if (client_nat_test(3)) { force_rport();

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RURI domain on NAT'd endpoints

2009-09-07 Thread Jeff Pyle
Right. I didn't have the usrloc portion configured before, and I was running fix_contact() on everything detected as NAT. I've modified the top of route[0] to look like this: if (client_nat_test(3)) { force_rport(); $avp(s:received_uri) = $source_uri; if (!is_method(REGISTER))

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RURI domain on NAT'd endpoints

2009-09-07 Thread Thomas Gelf
Thomas Gelf wrote: Jeff Pyle wrote: if (client_nat_test(3)) { force_rport(); $avp(s:received_uri) = $source_uri; if (!is_method(REGISTER)) fix_contact(); setbflag(7); }# nat_keepalive() further down after some pref checks One more thing: I'm doing

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RURI domain on NAT'd endpoints

2009-09-06 Thread Thomas Gelf
Jeff Pyle wrote: It seems to me when I first started playing with the nat_traversal style commands one difference was the way the contact field was stored in the location table. The new commands stored the public IP (post-fix_contact) while the old commands stored the private IP

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RURI domain on NAT'd endpoints

2009-09-06 Thread Thomas Gelf
Thomas Gelf wrote: The following should help you: modparam(registrar, received_avp, $avp(i:123)) modparam(usrloc,nat_bflag,6) setbflag(6); $avp(i:123) = $source_uri; nat_keepalive(); save(location); Forgot to mention that those lines shall obviously only be called once

[OpenSIPS-Users] RURI domain on NAT'd endpoints

2009-09-05 Thread Jeff Pyle
Hello, I have a UAC registered from behind a NAT router. I'm using all the nat_traversal commands to handle that, along with Mediaproxy. So far, so good. Outbound calls from the UAC work just fine. The UAC doesn't like the inbound calls, however, because the domain of the RURI is the public