Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] rewrite status-line

I think this response is borderline. RFC3261 specifically mandates SINGLE character to be used, however the reason phrase might contain as many spaces as needed, so that it can be argued that in this particular case the reason phrase is " OK" versus "OK" normally. --- 7.2

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] rewrite status-line

> > *From: *Users on behalf of Антон Ершов > > *Reply-To: *OpenSIPS users mailling list > *Date: *Friday, February 14, 2020 at 12:01 PM > *To: *OpenSIPS users mailling list > *Subject: *Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] rewrite status-line > > > > I understand correctly that on my

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] rewrite status-line

To: OpenSIPS users mailling list Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] rewrite status-line I understand correctly that on my side I can not fix this problem? пт, 14 февр. 2020 г. в 17:17, Антон Ершов mailto:suhari...@gmail.com>>: They can not пт, 14 февр. 2020 г., 17:10 johan mailto:jo...@demo

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] rewrite status-line

I understand correctly that on my side I can not fix this problem? пт, 14 февр. 2020 г. в 17:17, Антон Ершов : > They can not > > пт, 14 февр. 2020 г., 17:10 johan : > >> To me 200 OK is perfectly valid. The operator should fix this at his >> side. >> On 14.02.20 15:01, Антон Ершов wrote: >> >>

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] rewrite status-line

They can not пт, 14 февр. 2020 г., 17:10 johan : > To me 200 OK is perfectly valid. The operator should fix this at his > side. > On 14.02.20 15:01, Антон Ершов wrote: > > Hello friends! > we have final equipment that does not meet 200OK correctly. it adds an > extra space between 200 and OK. f

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] rewrite status-line

To me 200 OK is perfectly valid.   The operator should fix this at his side. On 14.02.20 15:01, Антон Ершов wrote: Hello friends! we have final equipment that does not meet 200OK correctly. it adds an extra space between 200 and OK. from the point of view of rfc is not very scary. but there i

[OpenSIPS-Users] rewrite status-line

Hello friends! we have final equipment that does not meet 200OK correctly. it adds an extra space between 200 and OK. from the point of view of rfc is not very scary. but there is an operator that cannot handle the given 200OK. I tried to fix it with change_reply_status in module sipmsgops. but it