Hello,
Ok, I found a work around for my problem with xpidf and Polycom.
After Ben's comment I was looking around Polycom configuration parameters
and found the parameter:
voIpProt.SIP.presence.nortelShortMode
After enabling it, Polycom phone (firmware 5) is starting to use
standard
Hello Bogdan,
Polycom actually did not want to give me any information.
But I think you are right, this is
http://www.cs.columbia.edu/sip/drafts/impp/draft-rosenberg-impp-pidf-00.txt
With SIPSAK I am able successfully change directory buddy status icon (see
my attached file).
I am using dialog
Hi Bogdan,
It looks like this document. I have searched in Polycom documentations and
community forum and I can not find any mention of the document.
So I posted the question on Polycom community forum hoping someone can give
an answer.
In Asterisk source code for chan_sip, they have a comment
s.org<mailto:users@lists.opensips.org>>
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] presence xpidf
Hi Bogdan,
It looks like this document. I have searched in Polycom documentations and
community forum and I can not find any mention of the document.
So I posted the question on Polycom community forum
I had a similar issue using the older Polycom OS and BLF using the directory
and buddy watch (xpidf+xml) that Freeswitch supports really well.
However, after upgrading the Polycom’s and using the newer
attendant.resourceList method for BLF, I found that they use the standard
dialoginfo
Hello Jarrod,
Thanks for pointing that. That's true what you are saying for
attendant.resourceList parameter. We also use it for BLF and call pickup.
XPIDF is used by Polycom directory presence.
It looks like XPIDF is the content type Polycom uses for P2P presence.
So, if I configure OpenSIPS to
: Monday, January 25, 2016 at 4:17 PM
> To: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bog...@opensips.org <mailto:bog...@opensips.org>>
> Cc: OpenSIPS users mailling list <users@lists.opensips.org
> <mailto:users@lists.opensips.org>>
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] presence xpidf
>
; To: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bog...@opensips.org>
> Cc: OpenSIPS users mailling list <users@lists.opensips.org>
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] presence xpidf
>
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> It looks like this document. I have searched in Polycom documentations and
> community forum and I
Hi Stas,
Is this the actual draft :
http://www.cs.columbia.edu/sip/drafts/impp/draft-rosenberg-impp-pidf-00.txt
?
Best regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 23.01.2016 17:12, Stas Kobzar wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
I can confirm that Polycom
Hi Bogdan,
I can confirm that Polycom still use xpidf with the latest firmware ver. 5.
I think Digium phones also use xpidf. Can not say for other vendors.
Looks like xpidf is supported by Asterisk, FreeSWITCH.
Quick google search makes me believe that pjsip, reSIProcate and linphone
(osip) have
Hi Stas,
While looking around for this xpidf I found this:
http://opensips.org/pipermail/users/2010-April/012336.html
So, what is the story with this xpdif ? is it still in use ? was it
replaced by pidf+xml ? as I see it died as draft.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and
Hi Stas,
You say you see the DOCTYPE line in NOTIFY packets and this is supported
by OpenSIPS ?
Now, on Polycom extension - if it is something end-2-end, it means it
does not require a presence server and everything should be between end
points by using SUBSCRIBE and NOTIFY (no PUBLISH, as
Hi Bogdan,
I do not think the DOCTYPE is the problem here. What I see is that when I
use MI to publish this application/xpidf doc, OpenSIPS does not want to
parse the document, and if I understand correct, this is because this type
of document does not have XML branch.
You are right, about
Hello Bogdan,
Thank you for your response.
The DOCTYPE within XML is seems to be Microsoft presence format:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-ca/library/cc246193.aspx
I am not sure if it can be used with PUBLISH though. For now I saw it only
in NOTIFY packets.
Polycom UA is using this type of
Hi Stas,
I checked with couple of SIP UACs and I found none using the "DOCTYPE"
line the published presence XML. So, I guess you should simply drop such
a line in your testing.
The "tuple" node is replacing your "atom" node (at least this is what I
noticed while trying other UACs). Here is
Hello all and Happy New Year!
I have a problem with publishing application/xpidf+xml (Xpidf) presence
info with OpenSIPS mi (ver11).
It seems like it is not supported.
The xpidf xml body is something like this:
After browsing around the source I think there
16 matches
Mail list logo
