Re: [QE-users] cell_dofree

2023-02-15 Thread Lorenzo Paulatto
"volume" It's written quite explicitly in input_pw.txt On February 16, 2023 7:48:54 a.m. GMT+01:00, Mpayami via users wrote: >In other words, I would like to do a general (not cubic ibrav=1) vc-relax, >with the constraint of keeping the space group. Just scale the axes uniformly. > >Mahmoud > >

Re: [QE-users] cell_dofree

2023-02-15 Thread Mpayami via users
In other words, I would like to do a general (not cubic ibrav=1) vc-relax, with the constraint of keeping the space group. Just scale the axes uniformly. Mahmoud - Original Message - From: Mpayami via users (users@lists.quantum-espresso.org) Date: 27/11/1401 08:18 To: Quantum ESPRESSO

[QE-users] cell_dofree

2023-02-15 Thread Mpayami via users
Dear QE Users and Developers Hi. I would like to do a constrained vc-relax such that only celldm(1) moves but all other celldm(2), ..., celldm(6) keep fixed. I did not find the case in "cell_dofree" or maybe I am confused with the explanations in DOC. Also I looked at init_dofree in Modules/cel

Re: [QE-users] invalid lattice parameters error

2023-02-15 Thread Lorenzo Paulatto
Hello, you can either use celldm — and in this case, do not forget to specify celldm(1) — or you can use    CELL_PARAMETERS angstrom but not both. hth On 2/15/23 15:23, Mr. Sheharyar Pervez RA FES wrote: I am trying to do a vc-relax calculation but I keep getting the error:      Err

Re: [QE-users] on-site attraction in DFT+U

2023-02-15 Thread Mpayami via users
Dear Iurii, Hi and thanks. Bests, Mahmoud - Original Message - From: Iurii TIMROV via users (users@lists.quantum-espresso.org) Date: 26/11/1401 13:43 To: Mpayami (mpay...@aeoi.org.ir), Quantum ESPRESSO users Forum (users@lists.quantum-espresso.org) Subject: Re: [QE-users] on-site at

Re: [QE-users] on-site attraction in DFT+U

2023-02-15 Thread Iurii TIMROV via users
> Is there a philosophy behind this change? No, it was just overlooked, here is the fix: https://gitlab.com/QEF/q-e/-/merge_requests/2035/diffs Iurii -- Dr. Iurii TIMROV Senior Research Scientist Theory and Simulation of Materials (THEOS) Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL)

Re: [QE-users] E-field units inconsistent

2023-02-15 Thread Stefano Baroni
In anything, there may be discrepancies in the cp.x code, which uses Hartree a.u. (e=1 in those units). SB On 15 Feb 2023, at 09:45, Lorenzo Bastonero wrote: Dear Joseph, In Ry a.u. the electric charge is sqrt(2), thus the units are correct. Best, Lorenzo Lor

Re: [QE-users] E-field units inconsistent

2023-02-15 Thread Lorenzo Bastonero
Dear Joseph, In Ry a.u. the electric charge is sqrt(2), thus the units are correct. Best, Lorenzo Lorenzo Bastonero PhD Student U Bremen Excellence Chair, Bremen Center for Computational Materials Science, and MAPEX Center for Materials and Processes University

[QE-users] Can qe calculate the vibration of phonons that are not gamma points

2023-02-15 Thread 孟静静
Dear Administrator: I am a QE user. I am facing a question: the QE can calculate the vibration of phonons (the detail results show in .dyn*). In .dyn* files, I can obtain the detail displacement of different atoms. Now I want to ask that can I directly read the phonon vibration of non-gamma poin