x27; when
generating the fully-relativistic US-PPs using ld1.x?
Thanks,
J. D.
********
J. D. Burton, Ph.D.
<mailto:jdburt...@gmail.com> jdburt...@gmail.com
Research Assistant Professor
University of Nebraska Lincoln
Physics and Astronomy
Office Ph
Hi Peng,
Each band is doubly-degenerate because your slab has two surfaces: A
spin-polarized pair of bands for the top surface, and an
oppositely-spin-polarized pair of bands for the bottom surface.
Cheers,
J. D.
J. D. Burton, Ph.D
Dear P.
Ugh. Thanks for catching that. I wish I had those hours back that I spent
searching for the problem. I appreciate your help.
Cheers,
J. D.
J. D. Burton, Ph.D.
jdburton1 at gmail.com
Research Assistant Professor
University of Nebraska Lincoln
Physics
anyone have experience with this? Or did I just do something stupid in
the input file?
Thanks,
J. D.
J. D. Burton, Ph.D.
<mailto:jdburton1 at gmail.com> jdburton1 at gmail.com
Research Assistant Professor
University of Nebraska Lincoln
Physics a
Cheers,
J. D.
J. D. Burton, Ph.D.
jdburton1 at gmail.com
Research Assistant Professor
University of Nebraska Lincoln
Physics and Astronomy
Office Ph. (402) 472 2499
Mobile Ph. (402) 419 9918
310A Jorgensen Hall
CV: http://tinyurl.com/2avltsc
***
takes way too much disk
space and my cluster administrator starts barking at me.
I've looked in the code and I might be able to figure out how to do it in a
very ad hoc way, but I'm wondering if anyone has a quicker solution.
Cheers,
J. D.
************
know I can just grab the eigenvalues and weights and do this myself (just
add up a series of properly weighted gaussians, one at each eigenvalue) .
but that seems to defeat the purpose of having a standardized code. J
Cheers,
J. D.
************
J. D. Burton, Ph.D
? I want
to try changing this to see what happens to the result.
Cheers,
J. D. Burton
************
J. D. Burton, Ph.D.
jdburton1 at gmail.com
University of Nebraska Lincoln
Physics and Astronomy
Office Ph. (402) 472 2499
Mobile Ph. (402) 419 9918
310A
Derek,
You should also include 3S and 3P channels, since their corresponding atomic
pseudowfcs will each contain one radial node, whereas your 2S and 2P atomic
pseudowfcs do not (or at least should not) contain any.
Cheers,
J. D.
J. D. Burton, Ph.D.
jlz101
ture, like
setting U_projection_type to 'file'. See the INPUT_PW.txt file for details
on that.
Cheers,
J. D.
************
J. D. Burton, Ph.D.
jlz101 at unlserve.unl.edu
University of Nebraska Lincoln
Physics and Astronomy
Office Ph. (402) 472 249
ntain atomic
d-wavefunctions of carbon. That would explain why the sum of your projected
dos doesn't match your total density, i.e. the extra peaks are d-bands.
Cheers,
J. D.
************
J. D. Burton, Ph.D.
jlz101 at unlserve.unl.edu
University of Nebraska Lincoln
P
with an increased nbnd (larger than the number of valence electrons) so that
some conduction band levels are also calculated.
Cheers,
J. D.
J. D. Burton, Ph.D.
jlz101 at unlserve.unl.edu
University of Nebraska Lincoln
Physics and Astr
12 matches
Mail list logo