Hi there,
I'm trying to use the option plot_2d=.true. from bands.x.
1) How should I set up the preceding pw.x calculation? Just a "normal" scf
with a large k-point grid on automatic is ok? Or it has to be
calculation="bands"?
2) Whenever I try to run it, I receive the error *** namelist no
HSE is "a PBE0 with a cutoff". I don't know if it has been fixed, but some
time ago ecutvcut interfered with that cutoff, making HSE behave just as
PBE0 (i.e., when ecutvcut was on, calculations done with HSE and PBE0 gave
the same results).
Maybe that's why in the examples with HSE was used
Hi,
I would like to know exactly which "version" of HSE is implemented on
Quantum-ESPRESSO.
In the original HSE work a value for the screening parameter w is used, but on
an errata another value is given.
In recent publications they are usually called HSE03 (which uses
w_{HF}=0.15/sqrt(2) and
Hi,
I'm Leonardo M M Jorge, the one who put the LDA-1/2 method on QE. And
yes, it is working!
You indeed have to create a new pseudopotential with ld1.x and the
flag "iswitch=4" (among other options, shown in the example file
atomic_doc/pseudo-LDA-0.5/si.lda.0.5.in ), and then use it on a
With "pseudotype=1" you can use just one projector for each "L", and
you used 2 "P"s and 2 "S"s.
Leonardo Jorge
Nanomol group
Universidade de S?o Paulo, Brazil
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:14, mohaddeseh abbasnejad
wrote:
>
> Dear users,
>
> I have faced this error while trying to generate a
Hi,
There is no problem on the coordinates, it's just a visualization
"problem". In XCrysden change "Display -> Unit of Repetition ->
Translational Asymmetric Unit". Keep in mind that in Espresso you have
periodic boundary conditions, and so what you was seeing were the
periodic images of each
Hello,
My group is interested in calculating the Hirshfeld charges (
http://www.springerlink.com/content/h54771160812822j/ ) of some
molecules. As it's not presently implemented on Espresso, I tried to
write myself a code to calculate Hirshfeld charges, based on the
existing voronoy code. But
ntal values, it's somewhat empirical
(or semi-empirical at least), if you used just theoretical values (even if
using a simplified model) it can be called ab-initio.
Is this right?
This can even create some discussion if some new functionals can be called
"ab-initio" or not.
al atomic rho, the
rest (I think) is mostly done.
> good luck,
> axel.
Thanks
Leonardo Matheus
Doctorate student - Physics Institute, University of S?o Paulo, Brazil
Nanomol group - http://nanomol.if.usp.br
l done in reciprocal space, and probably this is
where I'm confusing myself.
Can someone please give me a hand?
Thanks,
Leonardo Matheus
Doctorate student - Physics Institute, University of S?o Paulo, Brazil
Nanomol group - http://nanomol.if.usp.br
10 matches
Mail list logo