I do not really understand what you discuss about, and this in such an
emotional manner. It started about Reply to Mailing list, but now you
even fight about the Reply and Reply all buttons. This is
ridiculous, as it is well defined and leaves NO ROOM for interpretation.
On 2014-01-15 1:54 PM, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.eu wrote:
thunderbird need a plugin to make it work, roundcube it just works default
Thunderbird has had a proper 'Reply-To-List' button/feature for a long
time now.\
On 2014-01-15 3:04 PM, Kaz Kylheku k...@kylheku.com wrote:
Reply should
On 16.01.2014 11:01, Hartmut Steffin wrote:
I do not really understand what you discuss about, and this in such an
emotional manner. It started about Reply to Mailing list, but now you
even fight about the Reply and Reply all buttons. This is
ridiculous, as it is well defined and leaves NO ROOM
when we click on Filters under Settings we get the message:
Unable to connect to server (which makes perfect sense since it isn't
listening (yet)).
From what I've been able to find on configuring pigeonhole
(sieve/managesieve) for dovecot I need to use either LDA or LMTP as the
delivery
On 16.01.2014 21:22, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
I used Reply All and it did not have the proper behavior expected of
Reply All. The Reply-To header is irrelevant since it is not present;
it is not the cause of the breakage.
Sorry, I obviously missed this part. I read so many stupid things in the
On 16.01.2014 13:01, Hartmut Steffin wrote:
On 16.01.2014 21:22, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
I used Reply All and it did not have the proper behavior expected of
Reply All. The Reply-To header is irrelevant since it is not
present; it is not the cause of the breakage.
Sorry, I obviously missed this
On 16.01.2014 13:11, Reindl Harald wrote:
i get really tired of such amount of no clue
*this* is the RFC for mailing-list-headers
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4021#section-2.1.35 [1]
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2369 [2]
*these* are the list-headers of the roundcube list
Those RFC's do
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 08:35 +1100, Ben Schmidt wrote:
On 16/01/14 7:59 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.01.2014 21:43, schrieb Ben Schmidt:
Another is that sometimes people have direct copies delivered to
their inbox, but copies via the list filtered into a folder. Such
users want both
On 16.01.2014 16:02, Noel Butler wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 08:35 +1100, Ben Schmidt wrote:
On 16/01/14 7:59 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.01.2014 21:43, schrieb Ben Schmidt:
Another is that sometimes people have direct copies delivered to
their inbox, but copies via the list
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 18:24 -0800, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
NB [I]t annoys me greatly that people find the need to reply directly
NB as well as a list, I mean we *are* all on the same list, so we will
*all*
NB yes, including intended recipient, get the post, do people think
that
NB sending it
10 matches
Mail list logo