Re: [strongSwan] no CREATE_CHILD_SA in Strongswan

2009-05-18 Thread Tilak Adhya
Hi Andreas, Thanks for your help. I have another doubt regarding strongSwan CREATE_CHILD_SA. Can I delete the CREATE_CHILD_SA from the strongSwan side? What is the command for deleting the created CREATE_CHILD_SA in the strongSwan ? My requirement is to delete the CREATE_CHILD_SA in strongSwa

Re: [strongSwan] Strongswan 4.2.14 broken on ARM ?

2009-05-18 Thread Martin Willi
Hi, > Whenever the byte in memory is half-word-aligned, reading it as a uint16 > works as expected. The other half of the time, the compiler is adjusting > the pointer (back one) to make it half-word-aligned before reading the two > bytes as a uint16. Yes, it seems that some ARM CPUs don't like u

Re: [strongSwan] no CREATE_CHILD_SA in Strongswan

2009-05-18 Thread Andreas Steffen
Tilak Adhya wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > Thanks for your help. Here is the consistent debug information. > > You are saying that I need to send Traffic Selectors(TS) with the > CREATE_CHILD_SA request. But in the RFC 4306, it is clearly written > that TS are optional in the request-response for CR

Re: [strongSwan] no CREATE_CHILD_SA in Strongswan

2009-05-18 Thread Andreas Steffen
Hi Tilak, first a few comments on your ipsec.conf file: >config setup > interfaces="ipsec0=eth0" The interfaces options is for the FreeS/WAN KLIPS IPsec stack and is completely obsolete > klipsdebug=all > plutodebug=all These debug options are for the IKEv1 pluto daemon and n

Re: [strongSwan] XFRM has some limited specific crypto algos, how strongswan adds new crypto modules?

2009-05-18 Thread Daniel Mentz
am kara wrote: > Two computers are road warriors and have dynamic IP addresses and > want to have a secure IPsec connection. Do they have to to register > at (or contact) a server first? How can they trust that server in > this case that they haven't yet set up an IPsec connection? IPsec is a pee

Re: [strongSwan] no CREATE_CHILD_SA in Strongswan

2009-05-18 Thread Daniel Mentz
Hi Tilak, I suspect that Andreas meant the log files output by strongswan. The file you sent seems to be created by some tool called "IxANVL - Automated Network Validation Library (ANVL)" which was built to verify the correct implementation of network protocols. So you are setting IxANVL at str