2009/5/10 Stevo Slavić
> "Just because that's the way things are doesn't mean that's how they should
> be.", said a character in the movie "Australia".
>
I dig that.
>
> In this particular scenario, local test scoped dependency vs compile scope
> transitive dependency, it's my opinion that cur
The dependency plugin uses the existence of some marker files to detect if a
given artifact has been unpacked. By default these markers are stored in
/target/dependency.
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Melissa Tolliver wrote:
> I have an unpack execution which opens up a zip file in my deploym
Martin,
Thanks for the suggestion the thing is, that's what this tread started
about. I have an archetype-metadata.xml file and followed the documentation
(not at the link you provided which, fyi, doesn't document the filtered or
packaged attributes).
Anyhow, it seems that the archetype-meta
how about adding includes for wanted extensions and excludes for files to be
excluded
such as this FileSet declaration for archetype-metadata.xml file?
src/site
**/*.ftl
**/*.vm
http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTypes/fileset.html
?
Mar
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Doug Hughes wrote:
> Rather than editing my source files, is there not a way to disable velocity
> for spcific files or folders? I ask because some of the problem files in my
> archetype are binary. I'm not too comfortable editing those by hand as you
> suggest.
One can package, install and deploy such a war, no warning related to this
issue will get printed.
Regards,
Stevo.
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> IIRC maven warns you that you have changed a dependency from compile scope
> to test sc
IIRC maven warns you that you have changed a dependency from compile
scope to test scope.
you may have a valid reason for so doing, but maven is no medium and
cannot ask a higher plain what you wanted to do. if a warning is not
good enough, tough
Sent from my [rhymes with myPod] ;-)
On 1
Sent from my [rhymes with myPod] ;-)
On 10 May 2009, at 18:01, Stevo Slavić wrote:
"Just because that's the way things are doesn't mean that's how they
should
be.", said a character in the movie "Australia".
In this particular scenario, local test scoped dependency vs compile
scope
tran
Rather than editing my source files, is there not a way to disable
velocity for spcific files or folders? I ask because some of the
problem files in my archetype are binary. I'm not too comfortable
editing those by hand as you suggest. And I think they may be related
to the problems I'm
"Just because that's the way things are doesn't mean that's how they should
be.", said a character in the movie "Australia".
In this particular scenario, local test scoped dependency vs compile scope
transitive dependency, it's my opinion that current strategy is wrong. Local
test scoped dependenc
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Doug Hughes wrote:
> As a last test, I intentionally put invalid XML in the
> archetype-metadata.xml file. I was able to run archetype:create without it
> reporting an XML error. This tells me it's ignoring my metadata file
> anyhow any ideas on what I can do
can you display the maven-metadata.xml (and your project's pom.xml) and display
the command you are using which *should* reproduce this error?
thanks,
Martin
__
Disclaimer and Confidentiality/Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de
déni et de
I have an unpack execution which opens up a zip file in my deployment
directory.
However, even when the target files are NOT in place, Maven usually says
that the zip is already unpacked as follows
[INFO] runtimelib-1.0.1.zip already unpacked.
If I change false to true, and re-run, then the zip
By local I mean the pom currently being built. Stuff defined here always
overrides dependencies and transitive dependencies.
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 5:34 AM, Stevo Slavić wrote:
> Is there any reason why would local win in this particular case?
>
> Regards,
> Stevo.
>
> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 5
Sorry to keep harping on this topic. I'm hoping someone can offer some
advice. :)
As a last test, I intentionally put invalid XML in the
archetype-metadata.xml file. I was able to run archetype:create without it
reporting an XML error. This tells me it's ignoring my metadata file
anyhow any
Hi,
Is it possible to generate a download report with maven 2 as with xdoc
plugin in maven 1? I cannot find any information about this. How do you
create your download pages? Or is this not an intention of maven?
Thanks
Daniel
--
I wanted to add to my last message. I found some instructions on using
archetype:create-from-project to create a new archetype. I followed them to
create a new archetype project. This had a slightly different file layout
than the webapp archetype I was trying to customize before. However, I'm
s
Is there any reason why would local win in this particular case?
Regards,
Stevo.
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 5:26 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Todd Thiessen
> wrote:
>
> > Override the dependency defined in the POM, as Steve outline in his
> > earlier response. Let me qu
18 matches
Mail list logo
