Do not drop off list.
The list acts as a searchable archive for the next person that has your problem.
Please read the sonatype maven book.
Please get yourself a repository manager... There are three prominent options,
all equally capable, I will not recommend one over the other, in alphabetica
Looks like you are fighting maven (a loosing battle)
Only tags should have a fixed version
Sent from my iPhone
On 19 Feb 2012, at 00:29, "Dipl.-Ing. Torsten Liermann"
wrote:
> Hi, (sorry, I can't speak english :( )
>
> I would like to create a branch with a release version in all pom's
>
>
Am 19.02.2012 01:29 schrieb "Dipl.-Ing. Torsten Liermann" <
l...@liermann-it.de>:
>
> Hi, (sorry, I can't speak english :( )
>
> I would like to create a branch with a release version in all pom's
>
> The Snapshot version of the trunk is 3.0.2-SNAPSHOT and the release
version should be 3.0-b01.
C
Yes, it is unfortunately.
But, when release:branch ask me for the pom version of the branch, the pom will
have exactly this version string (without the SNAPSHOT extension).
I think, i will hack the release plugin for me.
my use case for reaching a fix version without affecting the development o
Hi all,
I want to generate a couple of resources based on the classes I have in
my project. Therefor, I have 2 questions:
- How do I get the classpath for the plugin correct? I need access to my
classes and it's dependencies.
- In which phase should I put this plugin? The phase I would normally
My goal is to run different versions of Junit Framework work. Surefire
supports three different generations of JUnit: JUnit 3.8.x, JUnit 4.x
(serial provider) and JUnit 4.7
http://
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/examples/junit.html
My pom file has the following provider:
Try release:prepare release:perform -Dtag=3.0-b01 -Darguments=-Dtag=3.0-b01
You probably don't need a dedicated branch.
Am 19.02.2012 16:11 schrieb "Dipl.-Ing. Torsten Liermann" <
l...@liermann-it.de>:
>
> Yes, it is unfortunately.
> But, when release:branch ask me for the pom version of the bran
Please upload your complete example project to github or similar, so
someone can have a look at it.
Am 19.02.2012 16:33 schrieb "Gogirl" :
> My goal is to run different versions of Junit Framework work. Surefire
> supports three different generations of JUnit: JUnit 3.8.x, JUnit 4.x
> (serial prov
The combination in your pom is illegal. The 4.7 provider requires
JUnit 4.7 or higher.
Kristian
2012/2/19 Gogirl :
> My goal is to run different versions of Junit Framework work. Surefire
> supports three different generations of JUnit: JUnit 3.8.x, JUnit 4.x
> (serial provider) and JUnit 4.7
>
In my 15 hour quest to stubornly solve this I have not thanked everyone who
has come with their useful remarks. This is a very impressive forum.
Kristian: As I wrote I have tried with version 4.81 and the only dependency
I use now is
junit
junit
[4.8.1]
Some answers inline:
On 20/02/2012, at 7:59 AM, Gogirl wrote:
> In my 15 hour quest to stubornly solve this I have not thanked everyone who
> has come with their useful remarks. This is a very impressive forum.
>
> Kristian: As I wrote I have tried with version 4.81 and the only dependency
> I u
Brent-
I'm seeing the exact same problem, and the remoteTagging workaround didn't
fix it for me. Did you ever figure out what was going on, and/or come up
with a solution? I'm using maven 3.0.3 and svn 1.6.17.
-Joel
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Release-pl
Hi all,
I received "Too many unapproved licenses" but, I don't see any
unapproved licenses log.
Error log:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.codehaus.mojo:rat-maven-plugin:1.0-alpha-3:check (default-cli) on
project hama-parent: Too many unapproved licenses: 39 -> [Help 1]
rat.txt log:
http://pe
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I received "Too many unapproved licenses" but, I don't see any
> unapproved licenses log.
>
> Error log:
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.codehaus.mojo:rat-maven-plugin:1.0-alpha-3:check (default-cli) on
> project hama-pare
14 matches
Mail list logo