Re: Why does one of our archetypes work, and the other gets "The defined artifact is not an archetype"

Howdy, well, maven-archetype is not core packaging (is not "built in"), so to make Maven "aware" of it, you need to use extension as explained here: https://maven.apache.org/archetype/archetype-packaging/ HTH Tamas On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 7:40 PM David Karr wrote: > Any more thoughts about

[ANN] Maven Fluido Skin 2.0.0-M8 released

The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Fluido Skin, version 2.0.0-M8. https://maven.apache.org/skins/maven-fluido-skin/ You should specify the version in your project's site configuration: org.apache.maven.skins maven-fluido-skin 2.0.0-M8 Import: This

Re: Why does one of our archetypes work, and the other gets "The defined artifact is not an archetype"

Any more thoughts about this? I think the key clue is at the end of my previous response, indicating that it doesn't even recognize that packaging type. That clearly means there are unexpected versions of something being used here, but I'm not sure what it would be. On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 10:56 

Re: NPE in AbstractMavenReport.execute, because 'this.siteTool' is null

ok, Draft PR created https://github.com/dev-aspectj/aspectj-maven-plugin/pull/137 to easily reproduce and describe the issue then I analyzed more in depth, as commented in the PR: it seems you found a bug in Plugin Tools on inherited @Component injection we'll need to open a MPLUGIN issue and

Re: Maven license distribution - repo

I presume: Maven can automatically download declared dependencies from a repository into the local repository directory as needed. Or users can manually download them into some other location and reference them as local "provided" resources. -- /_ Joe Kesselman (he/him/his) -/ _) My

Maven license distribution - repo

Hello, Could someone clarify what "repo" actually means in terms of license distribution. I searched the interwebz without much success. I also find the official documentation quite vague: This describes how the project may be legally distributed.

Re: apache-maven-3.9.5: JVM and Command Line Options

Thx, my mistake Regards, Tomaž On 11. 10. 2023 10:36 dop., Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: Hi It looks like you put mentioned lines in .mvn/maven.config not in .mvn/jvm.config - maybe in both ... Please look at: https://maven.apache.org/docs/3.9.5/release-notes.html there is: Each line in

Re: apache-maven-3.9.5: JVM and Command Line Options

Hi It looks like you put mentioned lines in .mvn/maven.config not in .mvn/jvm.config - maybe in both ... Please look at: https://maven.apache.org/docs/3.9.5/release-notes.html there is: Each line in .mvn/maven.config is now interpreted as a single argument ... Please also look at:

apache-maven-3.9.5: JVM and Command Line Options

using documentation: https://maven.apache.org/docs/3.3.1/release-notes.html#jvm-and-command-line-options So for example if you put the following JVM options into the|.mvn/jvm.config|file getting error: org.apache.commons.cli.ParseException: Unrecognized maven.config file entries: [mx2048m