Holger Hoffstaette schrieb:
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:05:34 -0800, David Jencks wrote:
Results :
Tests run: 1837, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
---
Jan K schrieb:
First time i created a project using
mvn archetype:create -DgroupId=com.careertales -DartifactId=careertales
-DarchetypeArtifactId=maven-archetype-webapp.
I got a folder structure as :
src/main
-- resources
-- webapp
In resources folder,i placed a simple java file(Test.java) w
Hi,
this could be done using profiles and resource filtering (google for
resource filtering, in the maven book there's some info about that as
well)... or
If it really needs to be two artifacts another way would be to have
three modules, one doing the work, and two "cache-access" and
"no-ca
I am facing a similar problem. Had no time to attack it now, but as far
as some googling told me, it's a bit of a problem with maven &
cobertura, better is emma & maven, because it's easier to both switch
instrumentation on in emma and merge the result files of the integration
tests with the un
ng it is better than what I have seen.
Regards,
John
-Original Message-----
From: Thomas Lutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 February 2008 11:24
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: Mevenide vs. M2Eclipse, Q for Eclipse/IAM
Hi !
Though this doesn't answer your question re
Hi !
Though this doesn't answer your question regarding a comparison.. :-):
I use Q4E and am really happy with it. much better than m2eclipse and
mevenide, pom synchronization and classpath integration works well. No
webtools support in the version I use, but that could have changed in
the me
You could try
http://code.google.com/p/q4e/
Other maven plugin, not as well known as mevenide or M2Eclipse plugin,
but for me it works a lot better...
Tom
Ben Lidgey schrieb:
There is a newer version of the M2Eclipse plugin (0.0.12) which might make a difference.
Also, there are settings i
