t;
> > > > thanks,
> > > > Robert
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 01:21:52 +0200, Bernd Eckenfels
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > And in addition to Jörgs Questions, do we also have a canonical
> &
> a
> > > buildtool specific issue but a general Java issue)
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > Robert
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 01:21:52 +0200, Bernd Eckenfels
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > And in addi
; > And in addition to Jörgs Questions, do we also have a canonical
> > > representation which replacements are actually preferred in ASL land?
> > >
> > > Gruss
> > > Bernd
> > > --
> > > http://bernd.eckenfels.net
> > >
> > >
>
> http://bernd.eckenfels.net
> >
> >
> > Von: Jörg Schaible
> > Gesendet: Freitag, September 14, 2018 1:16 AM
> > An: users@maven.apache.org
> > Betreff: Java 11 and java.xml.bin, etc.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
, September 14, 2018 1:16 AM
An: users@maven.apache.org
Betreff: Java 11 and java.xml.bin, etc.
Hi,
now with Java 11 not containing several jave.ee modules, what's the best
approach for a library that supports still Java 8? I guess profiles based
on the current Java version declaring the missing stu
@maven.apache.org
Betreff: Java 11 and java.xml.bin, etc.
Hi,
now with Java 11 not containing several jave.ee modules, what's the best
approach for a library that supports still Java 8? I guess profiles based
on the current Java version declaring the missing stuff as dependency are
a bad idea. Sho
Hi,
now with Java 11 not containing several jave.ee modules, what's the best
approach for a library that supports still Java 8? I guess profiles based
on the current Java version declaring the missing stuff as dependency are
a bad idea. Should a library developer add the new dependencies
neverthel
