Re: Maven 1.1-beta3 & maven-artifact-plugin 1.8

2006-08-11 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
; > > the 6/30 1.1-beta3-SNAPSHOT does not have this problem, but >> every >> > > > > > release since >> > > > > then >> > > > > > does. >> > > > > > See 20060630/ here: >> > > > > > http://people.apache.o

Re: Maven 1.1-beta3 & maven-artifact-plugin 1.8

2006-08-11 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
ttp://people.apache.org/~aheritier/maven/1.X/snapshots/ > > > > > > > > > > We are researching the problem to find a fix. > > > > > > > > > > In the meantime, I suggest the 6/30 snapshot if you would like to > > > > > use > >

Re: Maven 1.1-beta3 & maven-artifact-plugin 1.8

2006-08-10 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
We are researching the problem to find a fix. > > > > > > > > > > In the meantime, I suggest the 6/30 snapshot if you would like to > > > > > use > > > > 1.1. > > > > > It is very solid and the current one we use for our production &g

RE: Maven 1.1-beta3 & maven-artifact-plugin 1.8

2006-08-10 Thread Jeff Jensen
; > > > In the meantime, I suggest the 6/30 snapshot if you would like to > > > > > use > > > > 1.1. > > > > > It is very solid and the current one we use for our production > > > > > work > > > > (we've > > > > &

RE: Maven 1.1-beta3 & maven-artifact-plugin 1.8

2006-08-10 Thread Steve Molloy
; work > > > (we've > > > > used nearly every one of those snapshots all along as they were > > > published). > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Steve Molloy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: Maven 1.1-beta3 & maven-artifact-plugin 1.8

2006-08-10 Thread Jeff Jensen
> (we've > > > used nearly every one of those snapshots all along as they were > > published). > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Steve Molloy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 7:24

Re: Maven 1.1-beta3 & maven-artifact-plugin 1.8

2006-08-09 Thread Steve Molloy
> > > used nearly every one of those snapshots all along as they were > > published). > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Steve Molloy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 7:24 AM > > >

Re: Maven 1.1-beta3 & maven-artifact-plugin 1.8

2006-08-09 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
1.1. > It is very solid and the current one we use for our production work (we've > used nearly every one of those snapshots all along as they were published). > > > -Original Message- > From: Steve Molloy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 09,

RE: Maven 1.1-beta3 & maven-artifact-plugin 1.8

2006-08-09 Thread Steve Molloy
CTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 7:24 AM > To: users@maven.apache.org > Subject: Maven 1.1-beta3 & maven-artifact-plugin 1.8 > > Hi, > > I just upgraded from maven 1.0.2 to 1.1-beta3, and got the > maven-artifact-plugin 1.8 along with it. But Now I can't d

RE: Maven 1.1-beta3 & maven-artifact-plugin 1.8

2006-08-09 Thread Jeff Jensen
ECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 7:24 AM To: users@maven.apache.org Subject: Maven 1.1-beta3 & maven-artifact-plugin 1.8 Hi, I just upgraded from maven 1.0.2 to 1.1-beta3, and got the maven-artifact-plugin 1.8 along with it. But Now I can't deploy any artifacts because scp refus

Maven 1.1-beta3 & maven-artifact-plugin 1.8

2006-08-09 Thread Steve Molloy
Hi, I just upgraded from maven 1.0.2 to 1.1-beta3, and got the maven-artifact-plugin 1.8 along with it. But Now I can't deploy any artifacts because scp refuses my host key, while scpexe just doesn't do anything at all, but doesn't complain... So, I've reverted back to 1.0.2 for n