> Its okay. We have development environment always called as "main". If this
> is successful we will roll out this to other versions where we will call it
> out as 1.0, 2.0, etc...
This will cause spectacular failures in your builds in a rather short
period of time that will be challenging to deal
-
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://old.nab
" then I think you
> > need to rethink your artifact versioning...
> >
> > Wayne
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
> >
>
ail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Maven-and-Properties-tp27740774p27741650.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubs
> main
> ${code.version}
If you're seriously using a version value of "main" then I think you
need to rethink your artifact versioning...
Wayne
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional com
}
.
.
Thanks,
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Maven-and-Properties-tp27740774p27740774.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr
