Re: Maven2 versus JAXB

2006-09-20 Thread David J. M. Karlsen
chrisnc skrev: It fails on the following dependency: Missing: -- 1) javax.xml:jsr173:jar:1.0 Try downloading the file manually from: http://ftpna2.bea.com/pub/downloads/jsr173.jar Then, install it using the command: mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=javax.xml

Re: Maven2 versus JAXB

2006-09-20 Thread Wayne Fay
IANAL, but I believe the issue with the license is the non-transferable aspect of this license, along with the fact that this license is only granted upon acceptance of their click-shrinkwrap. Since Maven cannot enforce this (does not force users to click ACCEPT prior to downloading the

Re: Maven2 versus JAXB

2006-09-20 Thread Carlos Sanchez
You can use statx:stax-api it's the opensource version On 9/20/06, Wayne Fay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IANAL, but I believe the issue with the license is the non-transferable aspect of this license, along with the fact that this license is only granted upon acceptance of their click-shrinkwrap.

Re: Maven2 versus JAXB

2006-09-20 Thread David J. M. Karlsen
Wayne Fay skrev: IANAL, but I believe the issue with the license is the non-transferable aspect of this license, along with the fact that this license is only granted upon acceptance of their click-shrinkwrap. Since Maven cannot enforce this (does not force users to click ACCEPT prior to

Re: Maven2 versus JAXB

2006-09-20 Thread Wayne Fay
I won't disagree with you on the hope problems disappear but I do want to note that this problem is not Sun's fault -- its a BEA license on this particular artifact... Streaming API for XML (JSR-173) for JavaTM Specification (Specification) Version: 1.0 Status: FCS Release: [insert date]

Re: Maven2 versus JAXB

2006-06-29 Thread chrisnc
execution goals goalgenerate/goal /goals /execution /executions /plugin -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Maven2-versus-JAXB-tf1635682.html#a5104019 Sent from the Maven - Users forum at Nabble.com

Re: Maven2 versus JAXB

2006-05-31 Thread Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Jonathan Johnson wrote: The java.net repository pom for jsr173_api is here https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/repository/javax.xml.bind/poms/jsr173_ api-1.0.pom and it has a groupIdjaxb/groupId that's why the JAXB 2.0 maven plugin uses the reference groupIdjaxb/groupId and not

[Fwd: Re: Maven2 versus JAXB]

2006-05-18 Thread Franz Fehringer
Original-Nachricht Betreff: Re: Maven2 versus JAXB Datum: Thu, 18 May 2006 08:34:32 +0200 Von: Franz Fehringer [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Referenzen

Re: Maven2 versus JAXB

2006-05-18 Thread Franz Fehringer
://jaxb.dev.java.net/jaxb-maven2-plugin/ - Jonathan -Original Message- From: Franz Fehringer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 11:22 AM To: Maven Users List Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Maven2 versus JAXB Thanks. The 1.1 option has the slight problem that the referenced

Re: Maven2 versus JAXB

2006-05-18 Thread Franz Fehringer
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Maven2 versus JAXB Thanks. The 1.1 option has the slight problem that the referenced poms also still reference the 1.0.2 version, for example https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/repository/com.sun.xml.bind/poms/jaxb- impl-2.0.pom has dependency groupIdjavax.xml.bind

RE: Maven2 versus JAXB

2006-05-18 Thread Jörg Schaible
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Maven Users List Subject: Re: Maven2 versus JAXB Also, in the downloaded maven-jaxb-plugin-1.0.pom dependency groupIdjaxb/groupId artifactIdjsr173_api/artifactId version1.0

RE: Maven2 versus JAXB

2006-05-18 Thread Jonathan Johnson
: Maven2 versus JAXB Please note, that the policy for the groupId is javax.xml and com.sun.xml only. See also http://www.mavenregistry.com/search/artifacts?hl=enq=jsr173btnG=Search+Reg istry From: Franz Fehringer Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 8:55 AM

Maven2 versus JAXB

2006-05-17 Thread Franz Fehringer
Hello, I followed the instructions on https://jaxb.dev.java.net/jaxb-maven2-plugin/ without success. On mvn -U compile i get ERROR] BUILD ERROR INFO] INFO] The plugin 'com.sun.tools.xjc.maven2:maven-jaxb-plugin' does not

Re: Maven2 versus JAXB

2006-05-17 Thread Kenney Westerhof
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Franz Fehringer wrote: Hello, You perhaps missed this part in the instructions: 'Download This plugin will be added to the Maven 2 ibiblio repository and also to the java.net repository but we would like your feedback first. If you have praises or problems with this

Re: Maven2 versus JAXB

2006-05-17 Thread Alexandre Poitras
Your answer is in the download section of your link : Download This plugin will be added to the Maven 2 ibiblio repository and also to the java.net repository but we would like your feedback first. If you have praises or problems with this plugin please post your email by joining the mailing

Re: Maven2 versus JAXB

2006-05-17 Thread Franz Fehringer
Thanks, Now i get (legacy reenabled) D:\projekte\Maven2\iso-appmvn -U install [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] [INFO] Building Maven Quick Start Archetype [INFO]task-segment: [install] [INFO]

Re: Maven2 versus JAXB

2006-05-17 Thread Alexandre Poitras
On 5/17/06, Franz Fehringer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks, Now i get (legacy reenabled) D:\projekte\Maven2\iso-appmvn -U install [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] [INFO] Building Maven Quick Start Archetype

Re: Maven2 versus JAXB

2006-05-17 Thread Franz Fehringer
Thanks. The 1.1 option has the slight problem that the referenced poms also still reference the 1.0.2 version, for example https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/repository/com.sun.xml.bind/poms/jaxb-impl-2.0.pom has dependency groupIdjavax.xml.bind/groupId artifactIdactivation/artifactId

Re: Maven2 versus JAXB

2006-05-17 Thread Wayne Fay
In that case, download and manually install the activation 1.0.2 artifact into your local repo. This seems to be your only option. At the same, I would file a bug with the proper Java.net project so the new Jaxb release does not depend on the old artifact(s), if possible. Wayne On 5/17/06,

RE: Maven2 versus JAXB

2006-05-17 Thread Jonathan Johnson
/ - Jonathan -Original Message- From: Franz Fehringer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 11:22 AM To: Maven Users List Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Maven2 versus JAXB Thanks. The 1.1 option has the slight problem that the referenced poms also still reference the 1.0.2