Which of your dependencies do you need help with? I did the POM for
Commons Logging 1.1.1, so I have a pretty good idea of what's needed.
I had marked all the other dependencies for log4j as optional, because
prior to Maven, that is technically what people had been doing
naturally any
Paul Smith wrote:
Could some explain the difference between the dependency scope
"provided" versus "optional" if there actually is any..
We have converted log4j over to Maven recently and accidently forgot to
mark a few dependencies with flags indicating that, while needing for
compile time,
but that a user of your jar might only need one of (think
> oracle vs mssql bindings).
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 4:42 PM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: Dependency scope - provided or optional..
: Re: Dependency scope - provided or optional.. ?
On 10/05/2008, at 9:38 AM, Brianefox wrote:
> Provided means to include in the compile do but not in the package
> (war)
> Optional means that it wont be pulled in transitively by users of
> your jar
>
From this, I gather Optio
On 10/05/2008, at 9:38 AM, Brianefox wrote:
Provided means to include in the compile do but not in the package
(war)
Optional means that it wont be pulled in transitively by users of
your jar
From this, I gather Optional is actually what we want. Would it be
fair to say that Optional
Provided means to include in the compile do but not in the package (war)
Optional means that it wont be pulled in transitively by users of your
jar
Sent from my iPhone
On May 9, 2008, at 4:12 PM, Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Could some explain the difference between the dependency s