Such a notation would be much more useful if it were
1. standardized and
2. unambiguous
My personal preference would be something like
groupId:artifactId(classifier):version;extension[scope]
This way, the classifier, the extension, and the scope could be optional
Maven GAV URN?
Group:artifact:version:classifier:extension is pretty common
On Jun 26, 2010, at 1:39 PM, lukewpatterson lukewpatter...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be nice to be able to represent any Maven GAV in a string. Does
such a standard exist?
A good use case is for plugins that allow
Stan Devitt-2 wrote:
Why would the recommended format here be different than the format used by
the dependency plugin?
(e.g. junit:junit:jar:3.8.1:test )
I was looking more for a URN for Maven coordinates, which is slightly
different than the flattened form of dependency elements. e.g.
is : valid within a urn?
On 30 June 2010 13:34, lukewpatterson lukewpatter...@gmail.com wrote:
Stan Devitt-2 wrote:
Why would the recommended format here be different than the format used
by
the dependency plugin?
(e.g. junit:junit:jar:3.8.1:test )
I was looking more for a URN
On 6/30/10 8:42 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
is : valid within a urn?
Yes.
On 30 June 2010 13:34, lukewpatterson lukewpatter...@gmail.com wrote:
Stan Devitt-2 wrote:
Why would the recommended format here be different than the format used
by
the dependency plugin?
(e.g.
Luke,
are you aiming at IANA registration of the namespace identifier? (If
not, please use a x- prefix to mark the NID as experimental:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3406#section-3.1.)
Best wishes,
Andreas
-
To
Neither, it's extension.
Type, packaging and extension are often the same but not always. Type
sources actually means classifier sources and extension jar for
example. Packaging maven-plugin actually means extension jar.
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 29, 2010, at 2:34 AM, nicolas de loof
is le last part type or packaging ?
2010/6/29 Brian Fox bri...@infinity.nu
Group:artifact:version:classifier:extension is pretty common
On Jun 26, 2010, at 1:39 PM, lukewpatterson lukewpatter...@gmail.com
wrote:
It would be nice to be able to represent any Maven GAV in a string. Does
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:34 AM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote:
is le last part type or packaging ?
Is there a difference?
--
Germanys national anthem is the most boring in the world - how telling!
-
To
sorry, I mean packaging vs extension.
ejb packaging creates a jar extension
2010/6/29 Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:34 AM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote:
is le last part type or packaging ?
Is there a difference?
--
Germanys
Group:artifact:version:classifier:extension is pretty common
On Jun 26, 2010, at 1:39 PM, lukewpatterson lukewpatter...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be nice to be able to represent any Maven GAV in a string. Does
such a standard exist?
A good use case is for plugins that allow input
11 matches
Mail list logo
