is : valid within a urn? On 30 June 2010 13:34, lukewpatterson <lukewpatter...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Stan Devitt-2 wrote: > > > > Why would the recommended format here be different than the format used > by > > the dependency plugin? > > (e.g. junit:junit:jar:3.8.1:test ) > > > > I was looking more for a URN for Maven coordinates, which is slightly > different than the flattened form of <dependency> elements. e.g. the > <scope> portion isn't part of what I'm looking for, it is more a statement > of how I rely upon it > > > Brian Fox-3 wrote: > > > > Group:artifact:version:classifier:extension is pretty common > > > > I'm trying to wrap my mind around the differences and pros/cons of that vs. > a format listed in the Maven docs[1] > > groupId:artifactId:packaging:classifier:version > > The format Brian listed seems to work better when some portions are > optional. > > so maybe urn:maven:groupId:artifactId:version:classifier:extension ? > > [1] http://maven.apache.org/pom.html#Maven_Coordinates > -- > View this message in context: > http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/standardized-Maven-GAV-URN-tp511480p512112.html > Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org > >
