On Mar 23, 2008, at 8:20 PM, Siarhei Dudzin wrote:
Just a few ideas...
* In *my* opinion, the idea of having an equivalent of ant -P or a
readme.txt defeats the whole idea of maven as it uses *standard* build
lifecycle. People need to be made aware of that.
That's true, up to a point, howeve
Just a few ideas...
* In *my* opinion, the idea of having an equivalent of ant -P or a
readme.txt defeats the whole idea of maven as it uses *standard* build
lifecycle. People need to be made aware of that.
* Of course there is a learning curve, give them an introduction
presentation so that they
Joshua ChaitinPollak wrote:
I just polled the rest of my development team for who still uses our ant
build system and why.
One view from the maven side - one thing the ant people should never do,
is hold your release procedures to ransom.
We have a large project that has as one of its core
Hi Wendy --
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Patrick Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > 1. "mvn deploy" on the top level - I only want to deploy the war (which
> is
> > in the 'web' module). Mvn deploys everything
Thanks to everyone who replied, I justed wanted to point out some
issues with switching to Maven, since the developers asked what
complaints Maven evangelists were seeing.
On Mar 21, 2008, at 8:07 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
Thanks for the feedback Joshua, a few comments below:
1) I can't do
It sounds like you are struggling with some of the same issues I am. I
was asked recently to change our build system from ant to maven. In
fact, I did not want to use maven. I felt that our needs did not
warrant it and thought that Ivy would do well to solve our biggest
problem, dependency manag
On 21/03/2008, Patrick Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Comments
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > >2) We have lots of ant run-* targets I like to use.
> > >My response: Letting them know of the mvnrun script I've checked into
> > >our sour
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Patrick Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. "mvn deploy" on the top level - I only want to deploy the war (which is
> in the 'web' module). Mvn deploys everything. Not at all obvious how to
> change that behavior. Rather than spend any more time on this issue,
Comments
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback Joshua, a few comments below:
>
> >1) I can't do the equivalent of ant -projecthelp
> >Pointing out that all the common maven commands are documented on the
> >wiki doesn't seem to alle
Thanks for the feedback Joshua, a few comments below:
>1) I can't do the equivalent of ant -projecthelp
>Pointing out that all the common maven commands are documented on the
>wiki doesn't seem to alleviate this concern, which I admit really
>puzzles me. Has anyone else encountered this compla
We've been living with parallel Ant and Maven build systems for 6 to 9
months now, and most developers are mostly onto Maven, but some still
use Ant from time to time.
I just polled the rest of my development team for who still uses our
ant build system and why.
So Maven core developers,
11 matches
Mail list logo
