Status of MRELEASE-835?

2014-03-05 Thread Thorsten Heit
Hi, last year in april I added an enhancement request for the release plugin that allows a user to automatically resolve snapshot dependencies in release:prepare, i.e. there's no interaction necessary; see MRELEASE-835. I also added a patch I made using the source code of version 2.4.1 that is

Re: Status of MRELEASE-835?

2014-03-05 Thread Sascha Vogt
Hi Thorsten, Am 05.03.2014 15:29, schrieb Thorsten Heit: > [...] > I just wanted to know what the actual status is? Is there no need for such > a IMHO usable and CI- and/or build-server friendly feature? Is there > anything missing in the issue/patch/description/...? > At least a comment such a

Re: Status of MRELEASE-835?

2014-03-05 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi, I'll look into that. For the last couple of releases I've picked up a specific part of the plugin and tried to gather all related issues. The number of open issues is still huge (and some very old) so it takes some time to analyze every issue. However, this kind of reminders can help.

Re: Status of MRELEASE-835?

2014-03-05 Thread Elliot Metsger
I've been using a version of the patch locally, and it's been helpful. We have a relatively large project, with multiple modules that can be versioned independently of each other. Ultimately, these modules get packaged into a war at release time. In order to insure that these modules use the sam

Re: Re: Status of MRELEASE-835?

2014-03-05 Thread Thorsten Heit
Hi Sascha, > > [...] > > I just wanted to know what the actual status is? Is there no need for such > > a IMHO usable and CI- and/or build-server friendly feature? Is there > > anything missing in the issue/patch/description/...? > > At least a comment such as "I'll look into that" would be ni

Re: Re: Status of MRELEASE-835?

2014-03-05 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 5 March 2014 15:27, Thorsten Heit wrote: > Hi Sascha, > > > > [...] > > > I just wanted to know what the actual status is? Is there no need for > such > > > a IMHO usable and CI- and/or build-server friendly feature? Is there > > > anything missing in the issue/patch/description/...? > > > At