The newer snapshots look fine, so it looks like they fixed it.
Post your POM somewhere and I'll try it the same thing you are.
On Jun 20, 2010, at 10:07 AM, Laird Nelson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
>> Actually the POMs are only missing for the older snapsho
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Actually the POMs are only missing for the older snapshots, the newer ones
> have them. So if you've got snapshots turned off and you've been manually
> getting new ones with -U then maybe you have one of the version without a
> POM. Or the
Actually the POMs are only missing for the older snapshots, the newer ones have
them. So if you've got snapshots turned off and you've been manually getting
new ones with -U then maybe you have one of the version without a POM. Or the
metadata is no good and is pointing at one of the crap versio
I'll help you find the problem.
Look in
https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/snapshots/org/drools/drools-compiler/5.1.0.SNAPSHOT/
What's missing?
On Jun 19, 2010, at 7:12 PM, Laird Nelson wrote:
> I hope someone can explain this to me.
>
> I have a project that depends on o
I hope someone can explain this to me.
I have a project that depends on org.drools:drools-compiler:5.1.0.SNAPSHOT,
which can be found in
https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/snapshots/org/drools/drools-compiler/5.1.0.SNAPSHOT/
Now, the pom of that project declares several compi
