Jason van Zyl wrote:
dependency
groupIdfoo/groupId
artifactIdbar/artifactId
version1.0/version
/dependency
Is the way to declare dependencies.
Cool.
Do I interpret correctly that:
dependency
idblop/id
version13.123231/version
/dependency
Is a kind of shortcut for the
Actually, the id/id syntax is deprecated. It was the old way of
doing things, and ultimately didn't provide the grouping mechanisms
desired by some of the more popular framework projects (read Jelly,
etc.). I think it will still work, but I don't know for how long, since
I've heard rumblings
Hi there, I hav a small question..
in beta10 I could write a dependencytag like this
dependency
idtest1-test2/id
groupIdtest1/groupId
version1.0/version
/dependency
after a while I discovered thet I could also write the dependencytag
like this...
dependency
idtest1+test2/id
When I ran into this I had a question/observation. It might be nice if
Maven automatically understood groupId was artifactId when it was
missing.
Don't know if this would break anything, just a thought.
-warner
On Friday, October 3, 2003, at 04:24 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-03
