Unfortunatelly, this is not it, I don't use Shale :( Thanks though.
--
Regards
Paweł Czerwiński
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gary VanMatre) wrote on 2007-08-02 15:32:02:
Are you using Shale ViewController [1]? If so, try the nightly.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-409
http://www.coreservlets.com/JSF-Tutorial/
Section 4
But it's not complete.
En l'instant précis du 02/08/07 21:43, Wolf Benz s'exprimait en ces termes:
That one I had :-)
I hoped someone might have made a typical dev's summary
(By that I mean cut the crap, just the rules and e few
Hi Jessica,
the only reason why you can get something like this is if you have the
JSF-API (myfaces-api-xxx.jar, jsf-api-xxx.jar) in more than one
version on your classpath. Please check the WEB-INF/lib directory
carefully, and also all lib-directories of your container!
regards,
Martin
On
Thx David - that was what I was looking for!
-Wolf
On 8/3/07, David Delbecq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.coreservlets.com/JSF-Tutorial/
Section 4
But it's not complete.
En l'instant précis du 02/08/07 21:43, Wolf Benz s'exprimait en ces termes:
That one I had :-)
I hoped
David,
In the doc I found that you could get to the session via
#{facesContext.externalContext.session}
Are session request accessible *directly* as well?
To do simple stuff like e.g. #{request.requestURI} (would this work?)
-Wolf
On 8/3/07, Wolf Benz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thx David - that
jscook menu does not work in lasts versions.
It is stuck!
http://www.irian.at/myfaces/jscookmenu.jsf
http://example.irian.at/example-simple-20070803/jscookmenu.jsf
Any ideea ?
Thank you!
B
If you are in a JSP view handler, JSP implicit variable are accessible.
-- I'm not - I'm a fresh facelets convert!
However if you are not in JSP context (eg using Facelets as view
handler) am not sure session, request, headers, etc are available.
-- Well, they must be, I guess, although I'm
I'm starting to fall in love with ELv2! :-)
Thx Bruno,
-Wolf
On 8/3/07, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can use implicit objects such as request, session and header
with Facelets too, so #{request.requestURI} should be perfectly valid,
but of course, you can always go through
Matthias,
I really don't know how to capture a PPR response, unless I dive
deeply into the involved js code (which is compacted as far as I can
see).
Btw, someone on the Richfaces forum just answered that this duplicated
class issue is old, but I just installed the very last snapshot - same
I will try to create one ASAP, with/without Trinidad.
-- Renzo
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
can you create a simple WAR, that can be easily deployed to a
standalone tomcat ?
-M
On 8/3/07, Renzo Tomaselli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There isn't much more I can say. First I had a
can you create a simple WAR, that can be easily deployed to a
standalone tomcat ?
-M
On 8/3/07, Renzo Tomaselli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There isn't much more I can say. First I had a table in a Facelet
component, no problems. Then I wanted to add a suggestion box on each row.
I soon
Right,
that is all JBoss stuff,
a quick google search on the rendered class values make that clear
a) http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/RF-516
b)
http://jsourcery.com/api/jboss.org/richfaces/3.0.0/org/richfaces/component/html/HtmlSuggestionBox.source.html
HTH,
Matthias
On 8/3/07, Renzo
Oh yes, from firebug I got it. Indeed there are several duplicated
class attributes in the respose body:
table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"
class="dr-sb-int-decor-table rich-sb-int-decor-table"
id="browser:splitty0:navvy:query:f:sb:suggest" duplicate_class=""
colgroup
Hi Martin,
Thanks for that link. I had seen the Orchestra project information, but
I was hoping for a solution that didn't require me to add another
framework to my application. :-)
Still, at least I can look through their stuff and get some ideas.
We're using Spring in our application, but we
Oops, didn't paste all of the code in from my text editor. Here is more:
public class PagedTreeNode extends TreeNodeBase {
private ListPagedTreeNode children = new ArrayListPagedTreeNode();
private ListPagedTreeNode visibleChildren = new ArrayListPagedTreeNode();
private int startAt = 0;
I've started a project on the side using JSF and am trying to decide
on an AJAX component library. I'm debating between using A4J, which I
have used before and Trinidad, which I have not. Here are the
libraries that I have decided it must work with:
MyFaces 1.1.5 (or 1.2.0)
Tomahawk 1.1.6
Is anyone out there using Trinidad with JBoss Seam?
~~~
Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action
http://www.virtua.com/ http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting,
training, and mentoring
http://www.jsfcentral.com/
There isn't much more I can say. First I had a table in a Facelet
component, no problems. Then I wanted to add a suggestion box on each
row.
I soon discovered that it doesn't work, even when placed alone outside
the table.
I get the reported warning at each keypress within the input field -
On 8/3/07, Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've started a project on the side using JSF and am trying to decide
on an AJAX component library. I'm debating between using A4J, which I
have used before and Trinidad, which I have not. Here are the
libraries that I have decided it must
In the past I had quite a number of troubles getting these two systems
working together, and issues still keep on.
I tried to attach a suggestion box to a h:inputText when Trinidad is
also in the game. No way, server reports:
3-ago-2007 10.28.00
for some reasons the renderer renders two HTML class attributes, so
Trinidad renders the second as dublicate_class
so, the HTML is looking like
element class=foo duplicate_class=bar ...
can you provide a bit more infos?
like for instance, what the HTML looks like
Not familiar w/ jboss
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@myfaces.apache.org/msg40316.html
On 8/3/07, Kito D. Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What kind of problems did you run into?
*From:* Ulath (AKA: Murat HAZER) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Friday, August 03, 2007 12:32 PM
*To:* MyFaces Discussion; [EMAIL
They did for the next version (1.3) that has not been released yet.
Although, on the Seam forums they say you can replace the RI with Myfaces
if you want.
I have been waiting for a GA release (or maybe one more beta) before I try
it out.
Chris
Grant Smith wrote:
Hmm.. I thought Seam
Did some further investigation.
Shale-Tiger is validating against (so it seems) against local DTD's
included in org.apache.shale.tiger.resources.
DTD 1.0 and DTD 1.1
Looks like Shale-Tiger does not support the new 1.2 XSD schema yet.
Probably a question for the Shale team but I'll give it a try
Hi-
I just started working with jsf about a month ago. So far so good except I
ran into a road block about a few days ago. I have been searching on the
mailing list for some answers but I am not having any luck. I believe there
was a few responses in the mailing list regarding this but I
I have a project that uses MyFaces 1.2.0, Servlets API 2.5, Tiles 2.0.4,
Hibernate 3.2.0, Tomcat 6. Now, I have only recently upgraded to MyFaces
1.2.0 and the new Servlep API.
Recently I tried to start using immediate JSP EL expressions but I am
getting an odd behaviour which I would like to
Hi all,
I am using JSPX syntax for my JSF pages. I occasionally need to use
raw HTML surrounded by f:verbatim tags. However, I am hitting
a problem with the Jasper compiler of these verbatim tags break the
start/end tags of the HTML.
Here's an example:
f:verbatim
div class=addItemTable
+10
~~~
Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action
http://www.virtua.com/ http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting,
training, and mentoring
http://www.jsfcentral.com/ http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces
Use Facelets instead of JSP. You will not need verbatim tags anymore with it
On 8/3/07, Bryan Basham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I am using JSPX syntax for my JSF pages. I occasionally need to use
raw HTML surrounded by f:verbatim tags. However, I am hitting
a problem with the Jasper
I thought: why not putting this file facelets defn file for
tomahawk
right away in the meta-inf of the Tomahawk jar?
Won't harm nobody but will certainly help a lot of people.
Although I still subscribe to that idea, he had a point also:
MF and facelets are indeed 2 different
Thanks for the suggestion. I've never used facelets, so would you
be willing to sketch how this chunk of code would look using that
technology?
Is there any other solution without using facelets? For example, is
there a JSP (or Jasper) configuration that will relax the parser?
Thanks,
Bryan
I had to tweak the frameworks so that Seam conversations and Trinidad
Dialogs played together nicely. Which is a reason I haven't tried out Seam
1.3 yet - I haven't wanted to invest the time to migrate the tweaks. A
description of the tweaks is documented in the Seam forum (search for
Actually, as far as I know, all of the MyFaces committers are +1 for
making a tomahawk.taglib.xml file for MyFaces part of the
distribution. The problem is that we don't have an automated process
in place to keep the file up to date yet. Hence Bruno's comment that
we'll address it in Tomahawk
It would look like this:
div class=addItemTable
ul class=addItem
li
h:commandLink action=#{globalOptionsMgr.addOption}
value=LABEL /
/li
/ul
/div
[ie, what you had without any verbatim tags]
I think your only other option would be to xml-escape all of
It would be nice to have it automated, but really, is it necessary for
the short term? The taglib requires hardly any data, so is extremely
easy to maintain. To keep the maven site updated already requires
modifying its documents, so this is no harder. Sandbox already
requires even more work to
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 14:31 -0600, Bryan Basham wrote:
Is there any other solution without using facelets? For example, is
there a JSP (or Jasper) configuration that will relax the parser?
Yep, it's called JSP (not JSPX) :-)
That's the point of JSPX - that the input is valid XML. And that
Use facelets as you think it *should* look:
div class=addItemTable
ul class=addItem
lih:commandLink action=#{globalOptionsMgr.addOption}
value=LABEL //li
/ul
/div
Since it doesn't use JSP and therefore JSP tags, there is no need for
verbatim components, as all the source is JSF
* ability to skip the update phase to just check for
validation/conversion errors (would be nice functionality)
Trinidad has probably the most extensive set of fully
client-side conversion/validation checking out there,
obviating the need to post back to the server.
While client side
On 8/3/07, Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* ability to skip the update phase to just check for
validation/conversion errors (would be nice functionality)
Trinidad has probably the most extensive set of fully
client-side conversion/validation checking out there,
obviating
Thanks everyone for the helpful suggestions so far.
I decided to try facelets. I have walked through the setup
in section 1.4 of the facelets.dev.java.net docbook. But I
immediately hit the following error:
[03 Aug 2007 14:09:58,648] ERROR [http-443-Processor24]
Not sure which method I think is better but I would definitely like
there to be a standard, updated way to do this for tomahawk. I vote in
that vain if it counts for anything :)
Also, won't there be more involved than just the taglib.xml file, such
as a Tag Handler to get the tree2 component to
41 matches
Mail list logo
