Hi,
I have the following warning many times in logs:
12:43:45,671 INFO [STDOUT] 2008-09-04 12:43:45,671 [http-127.0.0.1-8080-1]
WARN org.apache.myfaces.renderkit.html.util.ReducedHTMLParser.parse(569) -
Invalid tag found: unexpected input while looking for attr name or '/>' at
line 208. Surround
Hi,
I attempted to upgrade to the latest Tobago version (I had the 1.0.17) and
all places where I had a are now empty.
I have no errors nor in my browser nor in the console...
Any ideas will help, thanks
Regards,
--
Zied Hamdi
www.into-i.fr
(previously in 2003)
zatreex.sf.net
Hi!
I'm new to MyFaces, Tomahawk and sandbox.
I'd like to use selectManyPicklist, but I can't find it in the
tomahawk-1.1.6 TLD.
(it is listed between the tags in this URL:
http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk-project/tomahawk12/tagdoc.html)
sorry I'm newbie.
Thanks in advance.
MB
--
View thi
Hi Zied,
2008/9/4 Zied Hamdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following warning many times in logs:
>
> 12:43:45,671 INFO [STDOUT] 2008-09-04 12:43:45,671 [http-127.0.0.1-8080-1]
> WARN org.apache.myfaces.renderkit.html.util.ReducedHTMLParser.parse(569) -
> Invalid tag found: unexpected i
Hi,
I have only posted what I thought was a bug, not a question. I am just
refering the mailing list
users to JIRA. I am not sure of another way to do the same thing without
the components
shifting upon validation. I tried panelLabelAndMessage instead of
panelHorizontalLayout and now the compon
Note: I am replying on the user thread, this is not a question that
should have been posted on the developers discussion mailing list
tbl0:categories will not work. The reason is the PPR works off of the
client ID, not the component ID. For example, if you change the radio
button in the 2nd row of
Hi all,
I have the following component
And I need to add some columns to the tree nodes, with some extra
information
Is this possible?
What I need to modify in order to add the columns that the one I added
to the tc:tree
Thanks in advance
Hi Volker :-),
Do I have to report this to MyFaces core?
Regards,
Zied
2008/9/4 Volker Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi Zied,
>
> 2008/9/4 Zied Hamdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have the following warning many times in logs:
> >
> > 12:43:45,671 INFO [STDOUT] 2008-09-04 12:43:45,671
>
From the comments on this email, it sounds like the html piece that is
shown below is actually embedded within javascript.
Can you please show the whole relevant section, including the
Hi Salvador,
2008/9/4 Bravo Villegas Salvador Francisco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I have the following component
>
>
>
>
> value="#{sdpTreeBacker.newTree}"
>
> state="#{sdpTreeBacker.treeState}"
>
> idReference="userObject.id"
>
> nameReference="userObject.name"
>
>
Hi,
This component is promoted to Tomahawk 1.1.7. In Tomahawk 1.1.6, This
component was a sandbox one.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:42 PM, mbazs123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm new to MyFaces, Tomahawk and sandbox.
> I'd like to use selectManyPicklist, but I can't find it in the
> toma
Yes, this confuses a few people. The myfaces websites all show
information about the current trunk code, NOT about the most recent
release. So newly-created components can be present on the website but
not available except when using a nightly snapshot.
Ideally we would have two websites, one
All,
Can any of you share any tips on migrating from Trinidad 1.0.5 and
MyFaces 1.1.5 to Trinidad 1.2.x, MyFaces 1.2.x, and Facelets? Aside
from the switch from .jsp to .xhtml files and the facelets
configuration, are there any code changes that are necessary? I ran
into a problem with the Trinidad
Hi Richard,
You're actually asking two different questions:
1. How to migrate to Facelets
2. How to migrate to JSF 1.2
For Facelets, you pretty much have it already.
For JSF 1.2, it's more complicated, first you have to run inside a JEE 5
container as JSP 2.1 is required. Therefore, simply dropp
Our testing department found an interesting issue with IE. I am not sure if
anyone has seen this. I created a simple snippet below that captures the
problem. Basically, you have two subforms. One for a main object one for a
related object. So basically to create the issue don't enter any
infor
Simon,
>From what I have read from Mathias' emails and from the Facelets site,
Facelets allow the use of JSF 1.2 without a JEE 5/JSP 2.1 container. I
have verified this by running MyFaces 1.2.3, Trinidad 1.2.9, and
Facelets 1.1.14 together from the Oracle JDeveloper 10.1.3.3 IDE which
does not have
Sorry for the double post, i forgot the [TRINIDAD] in the title
Our testing department found an interesting issue with IE. I am not sure if
anyone has seen this. I created a simple snippet below that captures the
problem. Basically, you have two subforms. One for a main object one for a
relate
Well, the quick suggestion is not to use subforms. I haven't seen
this issue, but then again, I don't have any subforms in my pages.
I think I remember reading some email threads that didn't recommend
using subforms.
At a high level, what functionality are you trying to achieve?
-Richard
On T
Hi Richard,
Yeah that's true, my bad. On my side, when we moved projects, it was always
to a real JEE 5 environment though so I cannot provide any personal insight
on to what to expect.
Regards,
~ Simon
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Richard Yee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon,
> From wha
The idea is that you will not get validation errors about required fields in
the parent object if you are creating child objects and vice versa.
Basically, we have pages where a parent object has one or many of a given
child object. Think like a person object with one or many addresses. So
when
One workaround/alternative might be to handle the contents of subform
in a lightweight dialog instead. Trinidad has a dialog framework that
you can use to have the user enter the new information and then save
it. We are using the dialogs on one of our pages to simplify a page
where the user has the
Are you able to debug this with the IE developer toolbar and see if
there is a busy/glasspane that is loaded on PPR and not dismissed?
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Justin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Our testing department found an interesting issue with IE. I am not sure if
> anyone has seen
22 matches
Mail list logo
