be
> > >
> > > 2012/3/13 Leonardo Uribe :
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > First of all, the problem is related to glassfish. This container
> does
> > > > not provide a clear way to change of jsf implementation.
> > > >
>
provide a clear way to change of jsf implementation.
> > >
> > > It is not that myfaces cannot run with glassfish, instead glassfish is
> > > not kind with any other alternate jsf implementation.
> > >
> > > The classloader flag is just a workaround
clear way to change of jsf implementation.
> >
> > It is not that myfaces cannot run with glassfish, instead glassfish is
> > not kind with any other alternate jsf implementation.
> >
> > The classloader flag is just a workaround in my opinion, but it works.
> > T
rizzly.http.ProcessorTask.doProcess(ProcessorTask.java:746)
>>> >> > at com.sun.grizzly.http.ProcessorTask.process(ProcessorTask.java:1045)
>>> >> > at
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> com.sun.grizzly.http.DefaultPr
workaround in my opinion, but it works.
The message:
*Both MyFaces and the RI are on your classpath. Please make sure to use
only one of the two JSF-implementations.*
Just ignore it. Glassfish classloader will find myfaces jars first
than mojarra ones.
The other problem you are experiencing is related to
> >> > at
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> com.sun.grizzly.util.AbstractThreadPool$Worker.doWork(AbstractThreadPool.java:532)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> com.sun.grizzly.util.AbstractThreadPool$Worker.run(AbstractThre
a) and
> > > still
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > error, i think the problem is the @Named is not injecting my
> > bean,
> > > > not
> > > > > > > MyFaces, because if i use @ManagedBean this works ok, but i
> dont
>
> > > Enviadas: Terça-feira, 13 de Março de 2012 12:28
>> > > > > Assunto: Re: Both MyFaces and the RI are on your classpath. Please
>> > make
>> > > > > sure to use only one of the two JSF-implementations
> > > > at com.sun.grizzly.ContextTask.run(ContextTask.java:71)
> > > > at
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.grizzly.util.AbstractThreadPool$Worker.doWork(AbstractThreadPool.java:532)
> > > > at
> > >
nKeyContextTask.call(SelectionKeyContextTask.java:59)
> > > > at com.sun.grizzly.ContextTask.run(ContextTask.java:71)
> > > > at
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.grizzly.util.AbstractThreadPool$Worker.doWork(AbstractThreadPool.jav
> > Cc:
> > > > > > Enviadas: Terça-feira, 13 de Março de 2012 12:28
> > > > > > Assunto: Re: Both MyFaces and the RI are on your classpath.
> Please
> > > make
> > > > > > sure to use only one of the two JSF-implementations.
> >
n provide
> the
> > > example and we can have a look at it.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > gerhard
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2012/3/13 José Luis Cetina
> > >
> > > > I see, i erase and only put @Named and @ ViewAccess
>
> > > :(
> > >
> > >
> > > 2012/3/13 Rafael Pestano
> > >
> > > > just a question, why do you have @Model,@Named and @ViewAccessScoped
> in
> > > > the same bean?
> > > >
> > > > i think
---
> > > >>
> > > >> Here are my libraries:
> > > >>
> > > >> --MYFACES
> > > >> myfaces-api-2.1.6.jar
> > > >> myfaces-impl-2.1.6.jar
> > > >> commons-beanutils-1.8.3.jar
> &g
of its system libs in my experience. Even
> > while
> > > myfaces runs, try to replace Weld for instance and you run into a mess.
> > > Glassfish as good as it is is an all or nothing pack in many cases.
> > > But it has been some time since I last touched Glassfish, thin
De: José Luis Cetina
> Para: MyFaces Discussion
> Cc:
> Enviadas: Terça-feira, 13 de Março de 2012 12:28
> Assunto: Re: Both MyFaces and the RI are on your classpath. Please make
> sure to use only one of the two JSF-implementations.
>
> I see now im using MyFaces instead of Mojarra, t
jarra but know i want to change but im having problems at the
>> start:
>>
>> My only requierement is use Glassfish 3.1.2.1.
>>
>> Hi i have this WARNING:
>>
>> *Both MyFaces and the RI are on your classpath. Please make sure to use
>> only one of the
ant to change but im having problems at the
>> start:
>>
>> My only requierement is use Glassfish 3.1.2.1.
>>
>> Hi i have this WARNING:
>>
>> *Both MyFaces and the RI are on your classpath. Please make sure to use
>> only one of the two JSF-implementations.*
know i want to change but im having problems at the start:
My only requierement is use Glassfish 3.1.2.1.
Hi i have this WARNING:
*Both MyFaces and the RI are on your classpath. Please make sure to use
only one of the two JSF-implementations.*
Why this happend if im using only jars from myfaces
tensions CDI) alternative config
org.apache.myfaces.extensions.cdi.jsf.alternative.config.AlternativeJsfModuleConfig
is active (v1.0.4)
Información: MyFaces Bean Validation support enabled
Información: [Started] MyFaces CODI (Extensions CDI) alternative config
org.apache.myfaces.extensions.cdi.core.alternative.config.AlternativeCodiCoreConfig
is active (v1.0.
classes to be present in your application.
>
> You need to configure Glassfish to disable the RI, or you need to
> remove the myfaces jars.
>
> 2012/3/12 José Luis Cetina :
> > Well sorry, really this says: ERROR Both MyFaces and the RI are on your
> > classpath. Please ma
lpestano
> http://code.google.com/p/jsf-conventions-framework/
>
>
>
>
> De: Mike Kienenberger
> Para: MyFaces Discussion
> Enviadas: Segunda-feira, 12 de Março de 2012 14:17
> Assunto: Re: Both MyFaces and the RI are on your classpath.
12/3/12 José Luis Cetina :
> > Well sorry, really this says: ERROR Both MyFaces and the RI are on your
> > classpath. Please make sure to use only one of the two
> JSF-implementations.
> >
> > Grave: Both MyFaces and the RI are on your classpath. Please make sure
2012 14:17
Assunto: Re: Both MyFaces and the RI are on your classpath. Please make sure to
use only one of the two JSF-implementations.
You are correct in that it is a serious error. Having both jars in
your path will result in identically-named, but differently-operating
classes to be present in
Cetina :
> Well sorry, really this says: ERROR Both MyFaces and the RI are on your
> classpath. Please make sure to use only one of the two JSF-implementations.
>
> Grave: Both MyFaces and the RI are on your classpath. Please make sure to
> use only one of the two JSF-implementations
re in class loading
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 12, 2012, at 10:34 PM, José Luis Cetina wrote:
> Ok, im a little confusing because it says in spanis:
>
> *Grave*: Both MyFaces and the RI are on your classpath. Please make sure to
> use only one of the two JSF-implementations.
&g
Ok, im a little confusing because it says in spanis:
*Grave*: Both MyFaces and the RI are on your classpath. Please make sure to
use only one of the two JSF-implementations.
Grave it means: seriuos in english.
But i see the application deploy ok.
Is there a way to see if the web app is using
to change but im having problems at the start:
>
> My only requierement is use Glassfish 3.1.2.1.
>
> Hi i have this WARNING:
>
> *Both MyFaces and the RI are on your classpath. Please make sure to use
> only one of the two JSF-implementations.*
>
> Why this happend if
lly this says: ERROR Both MyFaces and the RI are on your
> classpath. Please make sure to use only one of the two JSF-implementations.
>
> Grave: Both MyFaces and the RI are on your classpath. Please make sure to
> use only one of the two JSF-implementations.
>
> 2012/3/12 Shas
Well sorry, really this says: ERROR Both MyFaces and the RI are on your
classpath. Please make sure to use only one of the two JSF-implementations.
Grave: Both MyFaces and the RI are on your classpath. Please make sure to
use only one of the two JSF-implementations.
2012/3/12 Shasi Mitra
achable, identifier
'myBean' resolved to null
at com.sun.el.parser.AstValue.getTarget(AstValue.java:153)
I dont know if this is for the first problem (*Both MyFaces and the RI are
on your classpath. Please make sure to use only one of the two
JSF-implementations.*)
I read i need t
31 matches
Mail list logo
