Yee CN schrieb:
> Eclipse + myEclipseIDE is performing OK. For one thing eclipse is not
> opening every file you have - only the ones you left opened in your last
> session. For that matter starting up time is rather independent of the size
> of the project.
>
> In my 3yr old notebook eclipse + my
Yee CN schrieb:
> Is there any supports for Facelets in JDeveloper or JSC? I am using
> MyEclipse – and I am seriously looking for an alternative.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Yee
>
There is only one IDE I am aware of with some facelets support, and that
one is Exadel. Given the bumpy ride this IDE h
JDeveloper Compare with Java Studio Creator
Can you guys tell how well your IDEs would perform with large apps?
I was trying to get an app with 200 jspx files (admittedly, rather
large) up and running in JDeveloper, and the thing didn't start up
until after 10min.
Is work being done on making
March 2006 6:35 PM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: How Does JDeveloper Compare with Java Studio Creator
Can you guys tell how well your IDEs would perform with large apps?
I was trying to get an app with 200 jspx files (admittedly, rather
large) up and running in JDeveloper, and the thing didn&
e changed files.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
>
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag
> > von Martin Marinschek
> > Gesendet: Samstag, 4. März 2006 11:36
> > An: MyFaces Discussion
> > Betref
/JSF validation is the culprit. I have
> 50+ xhtmls - and it takes the order of 10min to compile.
>
> Regards,
> Yee
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, 4 March 2006 6:35 PM
> To: MyFaces Discussion
> Subje
Discussion
Subject: Re: How Does JDeveloper Compare with Java Studio Creator
Can you guys tell how well your IDEs would perform with large apps?
I was trying to get an app with 200 jspx files (admittedly, rather
large) up and running in JDeveloper, and the thing didn't start up
until after 10min
This is a problem we had with OC4J as well, although it was the
previous version, 10.1.2.
When compared to JBoss, it would take a very, very long time to deploy
an application, especially when EJBs were involved, sometimes at least
10 times as long.
That's one of the main reasons we eventually
Martin Marinschek wrote:
Thing = embedded OC4j in JDeveloper.
I didn't try JSC so far - would the performance be better there? Any
experiences?
regards,
Martin
No performance is not better there.
you will hang for ever in case that you open a project with 200 jsp
files.
best IDE that
Thing = embedded OC4j in JDeveloper.
I didn't try JSC so far - would the performance be better there? Any
experiences?
regards,
Martin
On 3/4/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you guys tell how well your IDEs would perform with large apps?
>
> I was trying to get an app wit
Can you guys tell how well your IDEs would perform with large apps?
I was trying to get an app with 200 jspx files (admittedly, rather
large) up and running in JDeveloper, and the thing didn't start up
until after 10min.
Is work being done on making this situation better?
Maybe I'm doing somethi
On 3/3/06, Yee CN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Is there any supports for Facelets in JDeveloper or JSC? I am using
> MyEclipse – and I am seriously looking for an alternative.
Unfortunately not. Facelets has come on strong basically at
exactly the wrong point in the development cycle for JD
On 3/3/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/3/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why can't JSC just run the component and actually let it render
> > itself by default? I know that's what JDeveloper does, and
> > it works well.
>
>
> Creator does that too, and it
Discussion
Subject: Re: How Does JDeveloper
Compare with Java Studio Creator
On 3/3/06, Adam
Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Why can't JSC just run the component and actually let it render
itself by default? I know that's what JDeveloper does, and
it works well.
Creat
On 3/3/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why can't JSC just run the component and actually let it renderitself by default? I know that's what JDeveloper does, andit works well.
Creator does that too, and it definitely works well ... the only
*required* additional code is a BeanInfo class (
Why can't JSC just run the component and actually let it render
itself by default? I know that's what JDeveloper does, and
it works well.
As a component developer (I've never worked on JDeveloper itself
at all, to be explicit), I really dislike the idea of writing a bunch of
extra Java code for a
On 3/3/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Craig McClanahan schrieb:> Dealing with this issue is one of the things I definitely want to> participate in here. The Creator team is finishing up some tutorials on> this that will help, and I'm doing the same thing in Shale to integrate
> the cou
Craig McClanahan schrieb:
> Dealing with this issue is one of the things I definitely want to
> participate in here. The Creator team is finishing up some tutorials on
> this that will help, and I'm doing the same thing in Shale to integrate
> the couple of non-visual components it has (subview,
On 3/2/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike Duffy schrieb:> Thx Werner.>> Do you know if Java Studio Creator supports MyFaces and Tomahawk?>> Mike>Not viusally yet, the problem is, that the JSC needs some additional
classes and config files which handle the visual part (actually most ifn
On 3/2/06, Mike Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Darn.Does JSC have a component library that compares favorably with ADF Faces?
Color me biased :-), but ...
Creator 2 does indeed come with a component library above and beyond
the standard ones. It's smaller than the ADF one (about 40
componen
Darn.
Does JSC have a component library that compares favorably with ADF Faces?
Mike
--- Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Duffy schrieb:
> > Thx Werner.
> >
> > Do you know if Java Studio Creator supports MyFaces and Tomahawk?
> >
> > Mike
> >
> Not viusally yet, the problem
FWIW, JDeveloper does support MyFaces as a custom taglib,
with visual editing, no need for any bonus config files. There's
extra metadata you can add to improve the editing experience,
which is the basis of JSR 276 (this metadata should be
standardized), but you don't need any of it.
I don't know
Mike Duffy schrieb:
Thx Werner.
Do you know if Java Studio Creator supports MyFaces and Tomahawk?
Mike
Not viusally yet, the problem is, that the JSC needs some additional
classes and config files which handle the visual part (actually most if
not all IDEs do)
nobody has done that yet, you h
Mike Duffy wrote:
Thx Werner.
Do you know if Java Studio Creator supports MyFaces and Tomahawk?
Mike
It does not support MyFaces and Tomahawk in its designer.
so you can not import them into JSC and use them in its page designer ,
until you make some required files that represent each
Thx Werner.
Do you know if Java Studio Creator supports MyFaces and Tomahawk?
Mike
--- Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well studio creator2 only covers the client side aspects
> currently, jdeveloper is a full blown enterprise ide, with ejb3
> support case tools etc...
>
> studio cre
Well studio creator2 only covers the client side aspects
currently, jdeveloper is a full blown enterprise ide, with ejb3
support case tools etc...
studio creator follows the absolut layout via css approach.
Both ides use heavily their own component sets (well parts of ADF have
been opensourced)
T
26 matches
Mail list logo
