Re: Source release

2006-05-09 Thread Sean Schofield
Well you are free to disagree. Or even better, you are encouraged to help document the existing limitations or tweak the maven scripts so we can more easily release the source bundles. Sean On 5/9/06, Lindholm, Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it is entirely acceptable to ask interes

Re: Source release

2006-05-09 Thread Sean Schofield
Actually I would go with the *tagged* release since that is *exactly* what goes into the artifacts (they should be the same as the branch though.) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/tags/1_1_3/ Even better, you can "browse" the source online with your browser without even checking out

RE: Source release

2006-05-09 Thread Lindholm, Greg
> I think it is entirely acceptable to ask interested parties (MyFaces > users) to go grab source code for the distributions from svn. It's not > too much to ask. Sorry, but I have to disagree. Source should either be included or available as a separate distribution. The build process should in

Re: Source release

2006-05-09 Thread vace117
ok, I can see from maven build files that 2_0_1 was used. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Source-release-t1585361.html#a4304711 Sent from the MyFaces - Users forum at Nabble.com.

Re: Source release

2006-05-09 Thread vace117
1_1_3? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Source-release-t1585361.html#a4304654 Sent from the MyFaces - Users forum at Nabble.com.

Re: Source release

2006-05-09 Thread Michael Harry Scepaniak
I think it is entirely acceptable to ask interested parties (MyFaces users) to go grab source code for the distributions from svn. It's not too much to ask. But, this contradicts the notice posted on the Source Code Repository info page (http://apache.org/dev/version-control.html): "If you are lo

Re: Source release

2006-05-09 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Your best bet for grabbing the source used to build the binary is to check out the 1.1.3 core branch from svn. For instance, https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/branches/1_1_3 On 5/9/06, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: But if I grab a snapshot or SVN, the source will proba

Re: Source release

2006-05-09 Thread Andrew Robinson
But if I grab a snapshot or SVN, the source will probably be different from the release right? I would like to be able to get the exact source code used to build the binary release. Is that what the snapshot is for 1.1.3 core for example? On 5/9/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: N

Re: Source release

2006-05-09 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Not that I know of. You'll need to either grab the source from svn or from the maven artifact repository: http://cvs.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/myfaces/ On 5/9/06, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Are there going to be source releases for tomahawk and core (and

Source release

2006-05-09 Thread Andrew Robinson
Are there going to be source releases for tomahawk and core (and sandbox hopefully too) to go along with the binary distributions? The binary distributions do not contain a source jar or folder. Thanks, Andrew

Re: Building Myfaces 1.1.1 Source release?

2006-02-16 Thread Dennis Byrne
ry 16, 2006 03:25 PM >To: users@myfaces.apache.org >Subject: Building Myfaces 1.1.1 Source release? > >Sorry for what might be a really dumb question but after reading the site, >wiki and unsuccessfully looking for a search option on the mailing list >archives, I'm pr

Building Myfaces 1.1.1 Source release?

2006-02-16 Thread Steve McCoole
Sorry for what might be a really dumb question but after reading the site, wiki and unsuccessfully looking for a search option on the mailing list archives, I'm pretty much lost in the maze of the SVN reorganization and the Maven build switch over. What I would like to do is be able to have an Ecl