Re: [OT] RE: JSF is the answer? I don't think so...

2006-12-14 Thread Andrew Robinson
Is it possible to use Seam with EJB 2.0 or only with EJB3? I'm pretty sure it doesn't. But it does work with POJOs. So you could have POJO backing beans that talk to your EJB2.0 beans. This way you can avoid EJB3 for now. I am using seam on two projects one POJO and one EJB3 and it is working

Re: [OT] RE: JSF is the answer? I don't think so...

2006-12-13 Thread Adam Koprowski
Hello everybody, Thanks for all your answers, hints, encouragement... I really appreciate that. I'm not about to give up, I'm just trying to figure out what's the best thing to do. Using plain old links may work in some cases but often you really have some kind of a state in your web

Re: [OT] RE: JSF is the answer? I don't think so...

2006-12-13 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hey. -) I saw in [1] that usage of Tomahawk components is not recommended - does it pose some (serious) problems? Is it possible at all to use them? How about dojo? [1] http://docs.jboss.com/seam/1.1BETA2/reference/en/html/controls.html We recommend the Ajax4JSF and ADF faces (now

[OT] RE: JSF is the answer? I don't think so...

2006-12-11 Thread Daniel Young
Hi Adam, I would recommend taking a look at JBoss Seam, which solves many (possibly all) of these issues. Enjoy, and don't give up, Daniel. _ From: Simon Lessard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 12 December 2006 2:11 AM To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: JSF is