I would suggest trying out the 2.0 in a branch of your source code and
testing it out. At the very least this will give you an idea what is better,
or what still needs some work. We have been fixing bugs quite quickly in
Trinidad 2, and it receives more attention than 1.2, but if people aren't
Right. I just noticed I said Trinidad 1.2. I meant 2.0. ;) I been
pretty sick the past couple of days so thanks for the correction
Andrew..
On Feb 27, 2011, at 3:07 PM, Andrew Robinson
andrew.rw.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
I would suggest trying out the 2.0 in a branch of your source code and
Im starting a new JSF project and must decide whether to go with a
stabile 1.2 impl or if I should risk it and use 2.0 beta. Im
considering 2.0 because the app will be used by powerusers - they need
all the clientside javascript speedups I can provide. So I would like
to hear your opinions - will
Hmm. Tough call. All I can really say is that great pains have been
taken in Trinidad 1.2 to make sure things are backward compatible.
Certainly by remaining active in the project, you can ensure that your
stuff does not require to total rewrite.
That said, the Trinidad trunk is currently
4 matches
Mail list logo
