Hi,
I plan to update myFaces from 1.1.5 to 1.2.2 in near future.
Does anybody roughly know the performance improvement for rendering or
processing pages between these two versions?
There was an estimation in the past that facelets would be about 10%
faster in rendering pages than jsps.
Is
Michael Heinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Another question is about the usage of jsf tags in 1.2.x
Is it better to use plain html tags (if possible) instead of jsf-tags
e.g. for images, divs etc when no EL expressions are used ?
Yes, definitely. This is just a block of verbatim text,
Hi!
Is it better to use plain html tags (if possible) instead of jsf-tags
e.g. for images, divs etc when no EL expressions are used ?
Yes, definitely. This is just a block of verbatim text, which is written
out very efficiently. Using a component to write the same text is much slower
hi people,
i think its better to use jsf components when you dont have html equivalent
component, it means that If the application server has a small tree of
objects, its performance would be better that another application with more
components.
2008/1/30, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would vote on the personal preference for this. Unless the JSF component
is really adding value then plain HTML is much faster. graphicImage is nice
as it adds the servlet context to the URL, but for other HTML elements, it
probably isn't worth it (notice that jsf has no a name=/ support). But I
Hi Simon (and Mario)
Yes, definitely. This is just a block of verbatim text, which is written
out very efficiently. Using a component to write the same text is much
slower and gains nothing.
well - not quite. in JSF1.2, every static text in your app will be
converted to a JSF-component. So
6 matches
Mail list logo