Lauren,
The PublishKafka processor series is where we really dug into the
details of the Kafka API and build the processors in a manner far more
aligned to the Kafka style. They work well. The PublishKafkaRecord
processor though is *really* nice in terms of performance and it means
it is part of
Hi list,
Simple question really, which Kafka processor should I use to stream
items into Kafka, more specifically, Kafka as it is used in Apache
Metron 0.4.0. The sources are very small (1KB) JSON messages.
Okay, thanks for the update. Figuring out where things went awry would be
helpful to make that process easier. We certainly have a lot of room to
improve on our documentation.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Jeff Zemerick wrote:
> I went through the steps again and it worked fine so it was
I went through the steps again and it worked fine so it was total user
failure somewhere on my part. I am curious as to where I went wrong so I am
trying to reproduce it to see if it's worth any documentation updates.
Thanks,
Jeff
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Aldrin Piri wrote:
> Hey Jeff
This can be considered a bug, at least in the sense that it is not
consistent with how the Generic DB Adapter handles it (i.e. no
requirement for an order by clause). Not to say that it's a good idea
to not have an ORDER BY clause when you are getting pages of rows, but
in this case, the incrementa
Hey Jeff,
Could you please provide a full nifi-app.log of the startup?
Thanks,
Aldrin
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Jeff Zemerick
wrote:
> I have a small flow that was exported from NiFi and it uses a
> QueryDatabaseTable processor. When the flow is converted to yaml and set in
> MiNiFi I
I have a small flow that was exported from NiFi and it uses a
QueryDatabaseTable processor. When the flow is converted to yaml and set in
MiNiFi I get the following error in MiNiFi's app log:
ERROR [main] o.apache.nifi.controller.FlowController Could not create
Processor of type org.apache.nifi.pr
Kumar,
There is no alternative solution. During your initial configuration, you
need to define the admin user. See your SO question for answers to those
questions.
Thanks
Matt
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 5:42 AM, kumar r wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> Thank you for the response.
>
> Is there any alternate
Hi Matt,
Thank you for the response.
Is there any alternate solution to achieve this?
Also please look at my another stack overflow question
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45346902/multiple-initial-admin-or-initial-admin-group
Thanks,
Kumar
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Matt Gilman
wr
