r other uses cases when a simple semaphore is sufficient the
RemoveDistributedMapCache can be useful.
Thanks
Carlos
-Original Message-
From: Matt Burgess [mailto:mattyb...@apache.org]
Sent: segunda-feira, 13 de Fevereiro de 2017 19:46
To: users@nifi.apache.org
Subject: Re: RemoveDistributedMapCache
able at the same time, what I wish achieve is a
> synchronized process for each table.
>
> Regards
> Carlos
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Burgess [mailto:mattyb...@apache.org]
> Sent: segunda-feira, 13 de Fevereiro de 2017 18:25
> To: users@nifi.apache.
[mailto:mattyb...@apache.org]
Sent: segunda-feira, 13 de Fevereiro de 2017 18:25
To: users@nifi.apache.org
Subject: Re: RemoveDistributedMapCache
Carlos,
With a RemoveDistributedMapCache processor in your suggested flow, there might
be an issue depending on when the duplicates are routed off. For
Carlos,
With a RemoveDistributedMapCache processor in your suggested flow,
there might be an issue depending on when the duplicates are routed
off. For example, if the first time we see the table name, that flow
file gets all the way through to RemoveDistributedMapCache before a
duplicate has bee
