Joe,
thanks. I added the LICENCE and NOTICE file to the nar and also licence info in
all classes.
Rgds,
Uwe
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 02. März 2017 um 22:07 Uhr
> Von: "Joe Witt" <joe.w...@gmail.com>
> An: users@nifi.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Re: Re: Re:
det: Donnerstag, 02. März 2017 um 22:07 Uhr
> Von: "Joe Witt" <joe.w...@gmail.com>
> An: users@nifi.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Re: Re: Re: new Nifi Processors
>
> Uwe
>
> To progress toward a pull request for inclusion in the nifi community
> we will need a LICENSE/NOTI
he Apache side?
>
> Rgds,
>
> Uwe
>
>
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 02. März 2017 um 15:53 Uhr
>> Von: "Matt Burgess" <mattyb...@apache.org>
>> An: users@nifi.apache.org
>> Betreff: Re: Re: Re: new Nifi Processors
>>
>> Uwe,
>>
>
"Matt Burgess" <mattyb...@apache.org>
> An: users@nifi.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Re: Re: new Nifi Processors
>
> Uwe,
>
> If your NAR can be licensed under the Apache Software License 2.0,
> then you shouldn't run into any issues with other folks want to
> pack
re of Apache 2.0 versus GPL3. That would
help me understand the issue better.
Greetings and thanks for feedback.
Uwe
*Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 01. März 2017 um 03:33 Uhr
*Von:* "Angry Duck Studio" <angryduckstu...@gmail.com>
*An:* users@nifi.apache.org
*Betreff:* Re: new Nifi Processors
.de>
Reply-To: "users@nifi.apache.org" <users@nifi.apache.org>
Date: Thursday, March 2, 2017 at 4:10 AM
To: "users@nifi.apache.org" <users@nifi.apache.org>
Subject: Aw: Re: Re: new Nifi Processors
Thanks Andrew,
Matt also pointed me to the same direction.
have a similar problem there? Do you know?
>
> I will spend some time on the topic on the weekend...
>
> Rgds,
>
> Uwe
>
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 02. März 2017 um 05:06 Uhr
> Von: "Andrew Grande" <apere...@gmail.com>
> An: users@nifi.apache.org
>
will spend some time on the topic on the weekend...
Rgds,
Uwe
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 02. März 2017 um 05:06 Uhr
Von: "Andrew Grande" <apere...@gmail.com>
An: users@nifi.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Re: new Nifi Processors
Basically the GPL license puts restrictions on how on
t whatever is necessary, so that the license is
> not a hurdle for using the processors. Nifi is a really great product and I
> still remember my first impression when I saw it.
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Uwe
> >
> >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 01. März 2017
t; Greetings,
>
> Uwe
>
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 01. März 2017 um 03:56 Uhr
>> Von: "Matt Burgess" <mattyb...@apache.org>
>> An: users@nifi.apache.org
>> Betreff: Re: new Nifi Processors
>>
>> Uwe G has made his processors available (thank you
t; Von: "Matt Burgess" <mattyb...@apache.org>
> An: users@nifi.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: new Nifi Processors
>
> Uwe G has made his processors available (thank you!) via his own repo
> vs the official Apache NiFi repo; this may be directly related to your
> poin
...@gmail.com>
An: users@nifi.apache.org
Betreff: Re: new Nifi Processors
Hi, Uwe,
These look useful. However, typically custom processors are either Apache 2.0 or MIT licensed. These don't seem to specify a license, but your business rule engine (jare) seems to be GPL 3.0 licensed. I'm no
Thank you Andre.
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 01. März 2017 um 04:05 Uhr
Von: Andre <andre-li...@fucs.org>
An: users@nifi.apache.org
Betreff: Re: new Nifi Processors
All,
It may also be worth to note that JFrazee maintains a list of NiFi related links here:
https://github.com/jfrazee/a
All,
It may also be worth to note that JFrazee maintains a list of NiFi related
links here:
https://github.com/jfrazee/awesome-nifi
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Matt Burgess wrote:
> Uwe G has made his processors available (thank you!) via his own repo
> vs the
Uwe G has made his processors available (thank you!) via his own repo
vs the official Apache NiFi repo; this may be directly related to your
point about licensing. Having said that, he is of course at liberty
to license those separate processors as he sees fit (assuming it is
also in accordance
Hi, Uwe,
These look useful. However, typically custom processors are either Apache
2.0 or MIT licensed. These don't seem to specify a license, but your
business rule engine (jare) seems to be GPL 3.0 licensed. I'm not sure that
fits with most uses of NiFi.
Can you please clarify?
Thanks
-Matt
16 matches
Mail list logo