Hi Romain,
You are correct. I have checked with Sys.out & its works perfectly.
Thank You so much for your valuable inouts.
Regards,
Abani
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Feedback-on-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2-tp4560812p463.html
Sent from the OpenEJB User mailin
Hello,
It will be helpful if you guys could provide a document help in a pdf file such
that developers can easily read the documentation content. Since I am new to
this so it will take bit time to provide more remarks.
Good work otherwise Guys... Keep it up... :)
Cheers
Chetan
We'd like
Not a bad idea, as a side note you can checkout the site here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/site/trunk/content/
Another good thing could be a one page cheat sheet.
- Romain
Le 1 mai 2012 13:28, "Chetan Sharma" a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> It will be helpful if you guys could provide a docu
Is the initial OpenEJB + Jetty now a dead initiative?
The reason why I ask is because the new embedded feature in Tomcat 7 still
is cumbersome to implement when compared to Jetty. This is especially true
when a "real" embedded solution is desired that does not require a directory
structure to
There's obviously been a big focus on Tomcat with the work that's gone on with
getting TomEE released and certified. I've always been really keen on getting
OpenEJB working with Jetty, and have had a very basic setup working which I
have previously used for functional testing:
http://openejb.ap
A basic solution would probably work in the short-term, but at some point we
would need a certified solution going forward due to vendor
requirements/restrictions.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Gallimore [mailto:jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 1:00 PM
To: use
couldnt we use tomcat? i find easy to hack tomcat than starting to
integrate jetty
thoughts?
- Romain
2012/5/1 Will Hoover
> A basic solution would probably work in the short-term, but at some point
> we
> would need a certified solution going forward due to vendor
> requirements/restrictions
Embedded Tomcat 7 is very limited on functionality. One of the missing
features is the ability to run within a self-contained executable JAR. This
feature is vital when using it as a truly embedded solution. Unless you know
something that I don't (which could very well be the case)?
-Original
i didnt try it but as in tomee we add servlet programmatically i dont see
anything blocking to do it for listener etc... so i guess that's possible
to use tomcat API to do so
- Romain
2012/5/1 Will Hoover
> Embedded Tomcat 7 is very limited on functionality. One of the missing
> features is th
I would be interested on how to accomplish it.
BTW, I know the thread is over a year old, but Mark Thomas says it can't be
done yet: http://grokbase.com/t/tomcat/users/113h2c3j55/tomcat-v7-embedded
-Original Message-
From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday,
it cant out of the box,
well maybe you should ping tomcat mailing list before. if somebody is
interesting it can help. Doing it manually should be possible (even if i
should look further to confirm) but it is really tricky for an end user
standard usage i guess ;).
- Romain
2012/5/1 Will Hoove
It may be just easier to get Jetty + OpenEJB working. There are also other
features that make Jetty a nice alternative. I'll look into the interim
solution that Jonathan proposed.
I guess the answer to a certified OpenEJB + Jetty configuration is out of
the picture for the foreseeable future, cor
yep that's why i spoke about tomcat. but integrating jetty and openejb in a
light manner is not so hard
- Romain
2012/5/2 Will Hoover
> It may be just easier to get Jetty + OpenEJB working. There are also other
> features that make Jetty a nice alternative. I'll look into the interim
> solutio
Just on the self contained jar point - I did at one point have TomEE
embedded inside a .war file, so you could either deploy the .war file in
TomEE, or you could do a java -jar myapp.war which booted an embedded TomEE
and started deployed the app. It still relied on a temporary directory
though - I
cool if you can hack on it :)
about certification that's more complicated, certifying jetty+openejb is
not certifying embedded jetty+openejb (same for tomcat). But well that's
not so far ;)
- Romain
2012/5/2 Jonathan Gallimore
> Just on the self contained jar point - I did at one point have T
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> cool if you can hack on it :)
>
Definitely happy to work on it if would be useful.
>
> about certification that's more complicated, certifying jetty+openejb is
> not certifying embedded jetty+openejb (same for tomcat). But well that's
A JettyEEContext ;)
Le 2 mai 2012 00:54, "Jonathan Gallimore" a
écrit :
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> > cool if you can hack on it :)
> >
>
> Definitely happy to work on it if would be useful.
>
>
> >
> > about certification that's more complicated, certifying
Thanks for the pointers/responses Jonathan. Iwas hoping to stay away from
multiple processes, if possible. I have a few projects I'm working on
outside of my normal day to day work where I can see some use for the Jetty
+ OpenEJB stack (maybe someday when the certified version becomes available
I c
Sounds good!
-Original Message-
From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 7:02 PM
To: users@openejb.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is OpenEJB + Jetty dead?
A JettyEEContext ;)
Le 2 mai 2012 00:54, "Jonathan Gallimore" a
écrit :
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 a
Hi Romain,
I have verified with System.out.println() instead of logger. its works fine.
I followed the instruction mentioned by you.
Regards
Abani
Hi,
Nice to have been helpful!
- Romain
Le 2 mai 2012 04:15, "Abani" a écrit :
> Hi Romain,
>
> I have verified with System.out.println() instead of logger. its works
> fine.
> I followed the instruction mentioned by you.
>
> Regards
> Abani
>
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
