Sounds good!
-Original Message-
From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 7:02 PM
To: users@openejb.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is OpenEJB + Jetty dead?
A JettyEEContext ;)
Le 2 mai 2012 00:54, "Jonathan Gallimore" a
écrit :
> On Tue
apache.org
Subject: Re: Is OpenEJB + Jetty dead?
Just on the self contained jar point - I did at one point have TomEE
embedded inside a .war file, so you could either deploy the .war file in
TomEE, or you could do a java -jar myapp.war which booted an embedded TomEE
and started deployed the app. It still
A JettyEEContext ;)
Le 2 mai 2012 00:54, "Jonathan Gallimore" a
écrit :
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> > cool if you can hack on it :)
> >
>
> Definitely happy to work on it if would be useful.
>
>
> >
> > about certification that's more complicated, certifying
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> cool if you can hack on it :)
>
Definitely happy to work on it if would be useful.
>
> about certification that's more complicated, certifying jetty+openejb is
> not certifying embedded jetty+openejb (same for tomcat). But well that's
ng. There are also
> other
> > features that make Jetty a nice alternative. I'll look into the interim
> > solution that Jonathan proposed.
> >
> > I guess the answer to a certified OpenEJB + Jetty configuration is out of
> > the picture for the foreseeab
oreseeable future, correct?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 3:14 PM
> To: users@openejb.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Is OpenEJB + Jetty dead?
>
> it cant out of the box,
>
> well maybe you should
uesday, May 01, 2012 3:14 PM
> To: users@openejb.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Is OpenEJB + Jetty dead?
>
> it cant out of the box,
>
> well maybe you should ping tomcat mailing list before. if somebody is
> interesting it can help. Doing it manually should be possible (even if i
> sh
uture, correct?
-Original Message-
From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 3:14 PM
To: users@openejb.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is OpenEJB + Jetty dead?
it cant out of the box,
well maybe you should ping tomcat mailing list before. if somebo
ilto:rmannibu...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 2:56 PM
> To: users@openejb.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Is OpenEJB + Jetty dead?
>
> i didnt try it but as in tomee we add servlet programmatically i dont see
> anything blocking to do it for listener etc... so i guess
esday, May 01, 2012 2:56 PM
To: users@openejb.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is OpenEJB + Jetty dead?
i didnt try it but as in tomee we add servlet programmatically i dont see
anything blocking to do it for listener etc... so i guess that's possible
to use tomcat API to do so
- Romain
2012/5/1 W
ucau [mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 2:39 PM
> To: users@openejb.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Is OpenEJB + Jetty dead?
>
> couldnt we use tomcat? i find easy to hack tomcat than starting to
> integrate jetty
>
> thoughts?
>
> - Romain
>
>
>
ginal Message-
From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 2:39 PM
To: users@openejb.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is OpenEJB + Jetty dead?
couldnt we use tomcat? i find easy to hack tomcat than starting to
integrate jetty
thoughts?
- Romain
2012/5/1
requirements/restrictions.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonathan Gallimore [mailto:jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 1:00 PM
> To: users@openejb.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Is OpenEJB + Jetty dead?
>
> There's obviously been a big focus on Tomcat wi
: users@openejb.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is OpenEJB + Jetty dead?
There's obviously been a big focus on Tomcat with the work that's gone on
with getting TomEE released and certified. I've always been really keen on
getting OpenEJB working with Jetty, and have had a very basic setup worki
There's obviously been a big focus on Tomcat with the work that's gone on with
getting TomEE released and certified. I've always been really keen on getting
OpenEJB working with Jetty, and have had a very basic setup working which I
have previously used for functional testing:
http://openejb.ap
Is the initial OpenEJB + Jetty now a dead initiative?
The reason why I ask is because the new embedded feature in Tomcat 7 still
is cumbersome to implement when compared to Jetty. This is especially true
when a "real" embedded solution is desired that does not require a directory
structure to
16 matches
Mail list logo
