Hi Brain,
You have defined a FetchGroup named "subEntities" with arecursion depth
of 50 alright. But defining a fetch group does *not* activate it. The fetch
group which is active by default is called default and includes fields of
basic types only.
One way to activate "subEntities" fetch g
Hi. I am attempting to leverage the recursionDepth FetchAttribute on one of my
JPA entity classes, but OpenJPA does not seem to be honoring the value. Even
if I specify a recursionDepth of 50, a load of the object graph is only
returning a recursionDepth of 1. I am using a FetchGroup on the e
Personally, I would recommend the use of one of OpenJPA's id generators.
I've worked with our test organizations that wanted to develop their own id
generators and they continue to run into locking and synchronization
problems. If you can use the OpenJPA generators, then your application
doesn't h
Adam's observations seem in synch with mine. Although I don't have personal
experience with storing localized data, I have exchanged e-mails with a few
people who have attempted it with the OpenJPA Entity Listeners. No
"reference accounts" per se, but it does seem doable.
Kevin
On Mon, Feb 2, 2
Hi,
Setting a batchLimit to -1 indicates there is no limit. Normally, this
would not be good since you could run into "out of resources" (memory,
connections, locks, etc) type situation. So, I wouldn't suggest running
with batchLimit set to -1 for any database. Setting it to 0 turns it off.
By d
Norbert,
There is no such "standalone" TableGenerator in JPA but some solution to this
has been recently posted here:
http://n2.nabble.com/Access-Oracle-Sequence-using-OpenJPA-tp2227943p2227943.html
Hope this helps.
Greetings,
Milosz
> Hi,
>
> for some reason I need a sequence generator, us
Gianny -
I see in a later post that you figured out that your persistence.xml file
wasn't in your classpath, but I'm wondering how this problem was manifesting
itself? ie: What were the error messages that you were seeing? Also, what
JDK are you running on.
Thanks,
Rick
Gianny Damour wrote:
>
Hi,
> I haven't been able to set a 'delete orphan' cascade yet.
OpenJPA supports delete-orphan semantics.
Annotate the relationship with @Dependent annotation. For further details,
please refer the doc [1]
[1]
http://openjpa.apache.org/builds/latest/docs/manual/manual.html#dependent
--
View
Thanks, Gianny,
We'll check that out as we continue improving this "out of the box"
enhancement process.
Kevin
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 6:04 PM, gdamour wrote:
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> After debugging, I discovered that I need to have a
> META-INF/persistence.xml
> file on my classpath for this to work
Simone Gianni on 01/02/09 22:11, wrote:
Hi all,
the problem of having a database containing localized data is quite
common, and a number of ways to do it are used here and there on the
internet.
What is, from your experience or from your knowledge of JPA, the best
way of doing it in JPA? Are
Hi Rick,
actually I use maven but I also run them all or partially in Eclipse, especially
when debugging, and especially when there is some fiendish hidden static
somewhere that carries over state from one test to the next, despite all the
precautionary set-up and tear-down code.
Rick Curtis
Hi,
for some reason I need a sequence generator, used to create unique keys
explicitly.
Is there any kind of "standalone" TableGenerator available in JPA ?
What I want to do is something like that:
"TableGenerator" genId = new "TableGenerator" (em, "XX") ;
Long next = genId.getNext () ;
myEnt
John Leach wrote:
>
> I must stop talking to myself. Yes it is a bug
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-327 OPENJPA-327
>
> The test case uses @PostUpdate, but the same thing seems to happen for
> @PreUpdate. Sigh.
>
This old bug came out of the woodwork to bite me today, presu
Hi Fay,
I've just found that all the problems have raised from 'batchLimit=-1'
if I set it to 0 everything work fine. now the weird optimistic exception
and that jvm error have gone.
So I think we can't think of this feature (batch statements). do you have
any idea?
Fay Wang wrote:
>
> Hi,
14 matches
Mail list logo
