Re: Container Managed EntityManager - is there a chance to control flush calls ?

2014-08-11 Thread Rick Curtis
memory. > And that is something we want to avoid. > > Now I am not sure if this are just "rumors" from the colleagues or if > there are cases where the EntityManager might execute a flush w/o any > association / trigger from a transaction. > Can you help on this topic? &

Re: Container Managed EntityManager - is there a chance to control flush calls ?

2014-08-11 Thread Christoph Weiss
ight execute a flush w/o any association / trigger from a transaction. Can you help on this topic? Cheers Christoph From: Rick Curtis To: users Date: 11.08.2014 20:38 Subject: Re: Container Managed EntityManager - is there a chance to control flush calls ? Nothing

Re: Container Managed EntityManager - is there a chance to control flush calls ?

2014-08-11 Thread Rick Curtis
Nothing immediately comes to my mind. Perhaps a better explanation of what you are trying to do will expose some other solution. One question though, what is currently driving the unwanted flush() calls? Thanks, Rick On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Christoph Weiss wrote: > Dear Community, > >

Container Managed EntityManager - is there a chance to control flush calls ?

2014-08-11 Thread Christoph Weiss
Dear Community, We are running OpenJPa with "container managed" EntityManagers (using WebSphere Application Server). Because of technical reasons we want to explicitly control when the EntityManager executes the flush. First I thought that the parameter "FlushMode" could be a solution, but