[users] Re: Hijacked thread. Was: Standalone Help Files

Ugly Me wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "H.S." > To: > Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 5:22 PM > Subject: [users] Re: Hijacked thread. Was: Standalone Help Files > > > >> You have alluded to some form of disability in another post in this >> thread. If you have trouble memorizing

Re: [users] Re: Hijacked thread. Was: Standalone Help Files

On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Ugly Me wrote: - Original Message - From: "Keith N. McKenna" It is not that people do not want you here. It is simply that it is long standing etiquette to start a new message or thread for a new question. I ***DID*** start a new message. I simply used what

Re: [users] Hijacked thread. Was: Standalone Help Files

On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Ugly Me wrote: - Original Message - From: "Robert Holtzman" To: ; "Ugly Me" Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 1:48 PM Subject: Re: [users] Hijacked thread. Was: Standalone Help Files Not such a petty argument. Hitting reply and changing the subject screws up mail re

Re: [users] Re: Hijacked thread. Was: Standalone Help Files

- Original Message - From: "H.S." To: Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 5:22 PM Subject: [users] Re: Hijacked thread. Was: Standalone Help Files > You have alluded to some form of disability in another post in this > thread. If you have trouble memorizing all the points, it might be a >

Re: [users] Re: Hijacked thread. Was: Standalone Help Files

- Original Message - From: "Keith N. McKenna" To: Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 11:02 AM Subject: [users] Re: Hijacked thread. Was: Standalone Help Files > Sean; >My memory is no more excellent or not than anybody else's. It is that > I follow this list not via email, but through t

Re: [users] Hijacked thread. Was: Standalone Help Files

- Original Message - From: "Robert Holtzman" To: ; "Ugly Me" Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 1:48 PM Subject: Re: [users] Hijacked thread. Was: Standalone Help Files > On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Ugly Me wrote: > > > > > > > I see this as such a petty argument that I can hardly believe it's > >

[users] Re: .rtf document not opening properly in OOo

On 03/28/2009 09:43 AM, John Rotomano wrote: > The rtf document to be found here > http://www.justice.gov.sk/dwn/l7/nares1348_ziaen_00.rtf > > does not show correctly in Open office writer > > This is strange as rtf is supposed to be a fully documented standard, > unlike the doc format. > > Sin

Re: [users] .rtf document not opening properly in OOo

nted standard, >> unlike the doc format. >> >> Since I need this form, could someone convert it properly to .odt ? >> > > 20090328 1146 GMT-6 > > I just finished writing bylaws for a soccer club and its saved in rtf > format but when moving the document between board m

Re: [users] .rtf document not opening properly in OOo

s rtf is supposed to be a fully documented standard, > > unlike the doc format. > > > > Since I need this form, could someone convert it properly to .odt ? > > > > 20090328 1146 GMT-6 > > I just finished writing bylaws for a soccer club and its saved in rtf > fo

[users] Re: Firefox 3.0.8 security release

On 03/28/2009 03:37 AM, Manfred J. Krause wrote: > Hi Richard, > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 04:02, Richard Detwiler wrote: >> Manfred J. Krause wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Firefox 3.0.8 security release now available >>> >>>

Re: [users] .rtf document not opening properly in OOo

convert it properly to .odt ? 20090328 1146 GMT-6 I just finished writing bylaws for a soccer club and its saved in rtf format but when moving the document between board members - those who use Office have one formatting and those of us who use OO have another. Im not all that impressed with rtf

[users] .rtf document not opening properly in OOo

The rtf document to be found here http://www.justice.gov.sk/dwn/l7/nares1348_ziaen_00.rtf does not show correctly in Open office writer This is strange as rtf is supposed to be a fully documented standard, unlike the doc format. Since I need this form, could someone convert it properly to .od

Re: [users] Firefox 3.0.8 security release

Hi Richard, On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 04:02, Richard Detwiler wrote: > Manfred J. Krause wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Firefox 3.0.8 security release now available >> >> >> > > Does this relate in some way to OOo? Are 'h

Re: [users] Re: Firefox 3.0.8 security release

Hi Gary, On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 03:04, NoOp wrote: > On 03/27/2009 04:53 PM, Manfred J. Krause wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Firefox 3.0.8 security release now available >> > > Awsome... is that now included in OOo :-) A

Re: [users] Firefox 3.0.8 security release

2009/3/28 Manfred J. Krause > Hi, > > Firefox 3.0.8 security release now available > < > http://blog.mozilla.com/blog/2009/03/27/firefox-308-security-release-now-available/ > > > > Manfred Thanks for the headsup, Manfred ! Henri