I don't believe IrfanView is open source. It is, however, free.
--Jekke
-Original Message-
From: Johnny Andersson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 11:40 AM
To: users@openoffice.org
Subject: Re: [users] open source croping software
I have IrfanView, but I never
That exception doesn't look like it comes from OpenOffice. That's from the .net
runtime.
--Jekke
-Original Message-
From: Alan Frayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 5:51 PM
To: users@openoffice.org
Subject: Re: [users] Openoffice 2.0 will not install on my
Or, if you don't need an integrated solution, I've been pretty happy
with Thunderbird.
--Jekke
-Original Message-
From: Kirill S. Palagin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 4:03 PM
To: users@openoffice.org
Subject: RE: [users] Openoffice Calendar?
OO does not
I used to teach Word for temps, so I'll throw some ideas from there.
They should adapt fairly well.
Traditionally, I would give the students two documents--one electronic
and one paper. The goal would be to make the electronic one match the
formatting of the paper one as closely as possible. The
Jean-Jacques--
This list is primarily for English-language discussion among users of
OpenOffice.org. My French is pretty rusty, so I'll say this in English first,
then *try* to translate into French.
OpenOffice.org is completely free--free to use, free to distribute, free to
change and
Nicole--
First the good news:
Your copy of OOo is completely legitimate and fully licensed.
Now, the bad news:
OOo is completely free to use, distribute, alter, etc. There was no need
to pay for it.
--Jekke
-Original Message-
From: Nicole de Soleil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
While all of what you say makes logical sense, none of it meshes with my
experience.
Cost of retraining is one aspect of TCO as is the initial sticker price of the
software. I agree that there is a retraining cost involved with upgrading
MS-Office, but nothing in the link provided suggests
You get open source programmers and give them a motivation, they might
come up with a contact/e-mail application.
They have--several, in fact. With a product like Outlook, where everyone has to
be using the same tool to get the maximum value, it's just hard to build up the
momentum for
... And, the replacement of MS Office's high-end feature set with
OOo's
high end feature set would be far more expensive than the difference
in
initial cost is worth.
That's my point. The difference for the user between MSO XP or 2003
and
MS 2007 is much larger than between MSO XP or
Lars, we're going to have to agree to disagree on this one.
Ah, OK, spoken like a true apologist. ;) What's your proposed solution?
Patience, perseverence, and a 20% across-the-board reduction in the size of
developer egos in the OSS world. The fact is that we do build a lot of products
In the same spirit, I hope you won't take offense as I dissect your
arguments. To answer your question, I'm not a manager or an executive.
I'm a developer in a small (150 people in 5 cities) firm and a
consultant to a slightly larger firm who gets called on to make
assessments of tool purchases on
Wow! You can see into the future!
It's part of my job. Or, maybe it will be one day.
--Jekke
-Original Message-
From: Jonathon Coombes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 4:39 PM
To: users@openoffice.org
Subject: Re: [users] Microsoft says Open Office.org 10 years
12 matches
Mail list logo
