[users] Re: 3.0.1 on WinXP requires a reboot?

2009-01-31 Thread NoOp
On 01/31/2009 12:42 PM, John W Kennedy wrote: > On Jan 31, 2009, at 10:52 AM, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: >> James Knott wrote: >> [cut] >> >>> I installed the version without Java and it wanted to be rebooted. >> >> One of life's mysteries :-) > > > New font installed, perhaps? > > -- > John W

[users] Re: 3.0.1 on WinXP requires a reboot?

2009-01-31 Thread NoOp
On 01/31/2009 12:42 PM, John W Kennedy wrote: > On Jan 31, 2009, at 10:52 AM, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: >> James Knott wrote: >> [cut] >> >>> I installed the version without Java and it wanted to be rebooted. >> >> One of life's mysteries :-) > > > New font installed, perhaps? > Does WinXP reb

Re: [users] Re: 3.0.1 on WinXP requires a reboot?

2009-01-31 Thread James Knott
John W Kennedy wrote: > On Jan 31, 2009, at 10:52 AM, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: >> James Knott wrote: >> [cut] >> >>> I installed the version without Java and it wanted to be rebooted. >> >> One of life's mysteries :-) > > > New font installed, perhaps? > I installed it on another XP system and i

Re: [users] Re: 3.0.1 on WinXP requires a reboot?

2009-01-31 Thread John W Kennedy
On Jan 31, 2009, at 10:52 AM, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: James Knott wrote: [cut] I installed the version without Java and it wanted to be rebooted. One of life's mysteries :-) New font installed, perhaps? -- John W Kennedy "Only an idiot fights a war on two fronts. Only the heir to th

Re: [users] Re: 3.0.1 on WinXP requires a reboot?

2009-01-31 Thread Peter Hillier-Brook
James Knott wrote: [cut] I installed the version without Java and it wanted to be rebooted. One of life's mysteries :-) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@o

Re: [users] Re: 3.0.1 on WinXP requires a reboot?

2009-01-30 Thread James Knott
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: > Jean Hollis Weber wrote: >> James Knott wrote: >>> NoOp wrote: On 01/28/2009 06:36 PM, NoOp wrote: > On 01/28/2009 06:33 PM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote: > [snip] >> Another data point: I just installed 3.0.1 on a WinXP machine >> that ha

Re: [users] Re: 3.0.1 on WinXP requires a reboot?

2009-01-30 Thread Peter Hillier-Brook
Jean Hollis Weber wrote: James Knott wrote: NoOp wrote: On 01/28/2009 06:36 PM, NoOp wrote: On 01/28/2009 06:33 PM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote: [snip] Another data point: I just installed 3.0.1 on a WinXP machine that had 3.0 installed, and it did NOT ask me to reboot. I also used the withou

Re: [users] Re: 3.0.1 on WinXP requires a reboot?

2009-01-29 Thread Jean Hollis Weber
James Knott wrote: NoOp wrote: On 01/28/2009 06:36 PM, NoOp wrote: On 01/28/2009 06:33 PM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote: [snip] Another data point: I just installed 3.0.1 on a WinXP machine that had 3.0 installed, and it did NOT ask me to reboot. I also used the without-JRE version. Sa

Re: [users] Re: 3.0.1 on WinXP requires a reboot?

2009-01-29 Thread James Knott
NoOp wrote: > On 01/28/2009 06:36 PM, NoOp wrote: > >> On 01/28/2009 06:33 PM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote: >> > [snip] > >>> Another data point: I just installed 3.0.1 on a WinXP machine that had >>> 3.0 installed, and it did NOT ask me to reboot. I also used the >>> without-JRE version.

Re: [users] Re: 3.0.1 on WinXP requires a reboot?

2009-01-29 Thread Jean Hollis Weber
NoOp wrote: On 01/28/2009 06:36 PM, NoOp wrote: On 01/28/2009 06:33 PM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote: [snip] Another data point: I just installed 3.0.1 on a WinXP machine that had 3.0 installed, and it did NOT ask me to reboot. I also used the without-JRE version. Same build info as yours. Hmm,

[users] Re: 3.0.1 on WinXP requires a reboot?

2009-01-29 Thread NoOp
On 01/28/2009 06:36 PM, NoOp wrote: > On 01/28/2009 06:33 PM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote: [snip] >> Another data point: I just installed 3.0.1 on a WinXP machine that had >> 3.0 installed, and it did NOT ask me to reboot. I also used the >> without-JRE version. Same build info as yours. >> >> Hmm,

[users] Re: 3.0.1 on WinXP requires a reboot?

2009-01-28 Thread NoOp
On 01/28/2009 06:33 PM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> The WinXPPro machine that I installed 3.0.1 on had 3.0 installed. (also >> has 2.4 on it - still working). When I did the 3.0.1 it didn't ask me to >> transfer settings, or anything, just to restart to complete the >> installation.

Re: [users] Re: 3.0.1 on WinXP requires a reboot?

2009-01-28 Thread Jean Hollis Weber
NoOp wrote: The WinXPPro machine that I installed 3.0.1 on had 3.0 installed. (also has 2.4 on it - still working). When I did the 3.0.1 it didn't ask me to transfer settings, or anything, just to restart to complete the installation. version.ini is showing buildid=300m15(Build:9379). Also note

[users] Re: 3.0.1 on WinXP requires a reboot?

2009-01-28 Thread NoOp
On 01/28/2009 04:21 PM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote: > TomW wrote: >> >> I just installed 3.0.1 on my Vista machine. Did not require a reboot. >> I have not found where it left the unpacked folder. It should have been >> placed on the desktop, but the only folder is for the m9 build. I then >>

Re: [users] Re: 3.0.1 on WinXP requires a reboot?

2009-01-28 Thread Jean Hollis Weber
TomW wrote: I just installed 3.0.1 on my Vista machine. Did not require a reboot. I have not found where it left the unpacked folder. It should have been placed on the desktop, but the only folder is for the m9 build. I then installed the Dev300 m40, after first uninstalling the m35. It

Re: [users] Re: 3.0.1 on WinXP requires a reboot?

2009-01-28 Thread TomW
NoOp wrote: On 01/28/2009 01:43 PM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote: NoOp wrote: I dualbooted the WinXP(Pro) machine and installed the new 3.0.1 (without JRE) version. When it completed unpacking, it came back informing me that I needed to restart WinXP in order for the installation to complete

[users] Re: 3.0.1 on WinXP requires a reboot?

2009-01-28 Thread NoOp
On 01/28/2009 01:43 PM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> I dualbooted the WinXP(Pro) machine and installed the new 3.0.1 (without >> JRE) version. When it completed unpacking, it came back informing me >> that I needed to restart WinXP in order for the installation to >> complete. That see