John Wiedenhoeft wrote:
Yes, I know. Transkribing a 200 pages manuscript takes really long. You
can imagine what it means if I have to insert 4-5 word joiners per
word... and how many keystrokes this would mean.
Why would you insert 4-5 word joiners per word? Presumably you only need
them for
Am Mittwoch, den 19.07.2006, 09:44 +0200 schrieb Claudia Drechsle:
> Hi John
>
> > "succRescentibus" breaks into "succ
> > Rescentibus" at the end of a line
>
> I copied that succRescentibus into a writer-document and it did not break at
> the end of a line but moved entirely to the next line. I
Hi John
> "succRescentibus" breaks into "succ
> Rescentibus" at the end of a line
I copied that succRescentibus into a writer-document and it did not break at
the end of a line but moved entirely to the next line. I tried with 1.1.5
and 2.0 (linux).
Perhaps it's a question of language. Try with
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 20:56:06 +0200, you wrote:
>Yes, I know. Transkribing a 200 pages manuscript takes really long. You
>can imagine what it means if I have to insert 4-5 word joiners per
>word... and how many keystrokes this would mean.
Why don't you record a macro containing all those keystroke
> OOo
> Writer allows no such tailoring, but allowing a break is as reasonable
> as preventing one, especially since PUA characters are often special
> symbols rather than letters.
In cases where it IS a special symbol, one would write a space before it
anyway...
> Accordingly OOo Writer's beh
John Wiedenhoeft wrote:
I'm typesetting some medieval texts using a special font designed for
scholars. It contains the standard Latin character set, and some Latin
characters that were only used in former times (long S, R rotunda,
abbreviation signs). The latter are in the Private use area, but