Re: [users] AutoRecovery - informational

2005-05-15 Thread James Finnall
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 23:50, Paul wrote: Yep - on numerous occasions I purposely crashed OOo to see how it worked. Under winXP it works as it should. It doesn't sound as if its the case under your linux flavour. Since it seems repeatable, I would suggest you file a bug and let the dev's

Re: [users] AutoRecovery - informational

2005-05-12 Thread Paul
'kill' is the command line version. Have a look at the man pages for more on kill. As noted, -9 = SIGKILL which is basically stop it now and don't give process time to clean up etc... /paul On 5/12/05, James Finnall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 12 May 2005 00:03, Caleb Marcus wrote:

[users] AutoRecovery - informational

2005-05-11 Thread Paul
There has been some questions of late concerning auto recovery. After a little digging below is some information that I've found. It seems that there is one important location and one important file for this process. The important location is below: C:\Documents and Settings\X\Application

Re: [users] AutoRecovery - informational

2005-05-11 Thread James Finnall
I too was interested in the autorecovery feature. So I was trying to do some testing and file locations, etc. under Linux version of OOo Beta version 1.9.95. I was not able to locate a file called autorecovery.xcu anywhere under my system. I did locate a file called Recovery.xcu however and

Re: [users] AutoRecovery - informational

2005-05-11 Thread Paul
Yep - on numerous occasions I purposely crashed OOo to see how it worked. Under winXP it works as it should. It doesn't sound as if its the case under your linux flavour. Since it seems repeatable, I would suggest you file a bug and let the dev's work on it. /paul On 5/12/05, James Finnall

Re: [users] AutoRecovery - informational

2005-05-11 Thread Caleb Marcus
How did you purposely crash Linux? Paul wrote: Yep - on numerous occasions I purposely crashed OOo to see how it worked. Under winXP it works as it should. It doesn't sound as if its the case under your linux flavour. Since it seems repeatable, I would suggest you file a bug and let the dev's

Re: [users] AutoRecovery - informational

2005-05-11 Thread Paul
James will probably tell you how he did it, but I would think that kill -9 the PID of the soffice binary would probably do it for you. /paul On 5/12/05, Caleb Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How did you purposely crash Linux? Paul wrote: Yep - on numerous occasions I purposely crashed OOo

Re: [users] AutoRecovery - informational

2005-05-11 Thread James Finnall
On Thursday 12 May 2005 00:03, Caleb Marcus wrote: How did you purposely crash Linux? I did not crash Linux itself. That would take me hours just to recover from it. I used KDE System guard and selected all the processes and then killed them. Now, I saw Paul's response as well. I do not